Mike Phelan O'Toole's Cracked Syntax : Collected Writings & Blogs

FOR PRESS: Boston Indie Filmmaker, Video Artists Hit PTown To Host Surreal Films @ Art House Theatre

2009-10-07T18:00:00.000-07:00

This, along with photos, bio and fact sheet for D.L. went out today... Check it out and share it if you can! I wrote it, with the help of D.L.'s film descriptions. Thanks. -MPO.

Manic Schematic PR Firm
Mike Phelan O’Toole
Mikeovideo@gmail.com
###-###-#### / ###-###-###
http://www.MikeOToole.net
http://www.DLPolonsky.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Boston Indie Filmmaker, Video Artists Hit PTown To Host
Retrospective, Surreal Film Showcase at The Art House Theatre

(Boston, MA, 10/1/09) – Indie filmmaker D.L. Polonsky and video artist
Mike Phelan O’Toole, after a series of acclaimed screenings at
Brookline, MA’s famous Coolidge Corner Theatre, and off the heels of a
tour stop in Providence, RI, announce the arrival of "D.L. Polonsky’s
Non-Violent Anarchy Film Festival" to Provincetown, MA. This Polonsky
“career retrospective” showcase will be a two hour movie screening of
eclectic low budget films, animation, nontraditional music videos and
esoteric video art, taking place at Provincetown's famed Art House
Theatre, at 214 Commercial St, on October 24th at 8:00PM. The show
will be emceed by O'Toole, noted for his caustic wit in spokenword
performance, and the colorful pun-spouting Polonsky himself. A lively
question and answer session will follow the films. The event is
sponsored in part by prolific Boston video artist and cable access
show producer Lawrence Hollie. Admission is $5.00.

Polonsky’s innovative work dates back to when he was a young boy,
crafting strange and provocative films with his brother, Gabriel. The
event will exhibit a selection of modern work, such as “To Mock a
Killing Bird,” a slapstick anti-war comedy about a
draft-dodger, set from 1972-74, and "Grill, Interrupted," which
chronicles the surreal development of a comedy cooking show, as well
as older, rare gems, such as “The Flyer." This is a short film that
mixes live action with D.L.'s own animation, as the images of a flyer
an unsuspecting man posts begin to come to life. The festival caps off
with "The Big Wall," a longer-form film made in the early 90's. After
an artist is hired to draw charicatures at a same-sex wedding, one of
the men getting married is killed by gay-bashers. The movie is laced
with socio-political commentary on gay people being accepted in
mainstream society, and other social issues. In addition, the lineup
includes a promo for the film Polonsky is currently crafting, "12:54,
Half a Dozen of the Other." This film stars Lawrence Hollie, Andy
MacBain, and event co-host Mike Phelan O'Toole. It is a comedy-drama
about a lumber salesman who finds buried coins during the current
recession.

For more information on the film lineup for “D.L. Polonsky’s
Non-Violent Anarchy Film Festival,” and to arrange interviews, please
contact Mike Phelan O’Toole. Photos and a fact sheet are available

As an Editor’s Pick, Shaula Clark, of The Boston Phoenix, proclaims
Polonsky’s “Nonviolent Anarchy” fest to include "The kind of films
that could revolutionize cinema, nonviolently or otherwise."
Additionally, for those wanting to pin down D.L.’s style, The
Brookline Tab’s Alex Stevens winkingly suggests to "Think David Lynch,
without all the mainstream storytelling." As a locally renowned,
openly gay artist, living in Allston, MA, D.L. has been profiled in
Boston's version of the Bay Windows newspaper on more than one
occasion.

The showcase comes out of a desire from the trio to expand their potential
audience, and reward quality creative efforts that may be overlooked
by more pretentious "festival" outlets, "It's a very D.I.Y, punk
approach. We want to show people that these different works can be
innovative and entertaining, and that the personalities behind them
are just as interesting," says O'Toole. "We saw it was important to
expand outside the Boston area, and we’re really excited to meet a new
audience. D.L.’s flicks are so wild. He deserves to see his work up on
the big screen, live, and so do underground film fans everywhere, even
though he is too modest to want to have a press release put out to let
people know about this show."

In addition to his video work, Polonsky has made a name for himself in
the Allston area as the anti-Shepard Fairy, plastering his artwork up
wherever it will stick, while simultaneously having had political
portraits published in several major newspapers and magazines.
Additionally, he has had a children's book published that he
wrote/illustrated titled "The Letter Bandits."

Hollie and O'Toole have been advocates of collaborative media, and
purveyors of unique video art, as producers/ hosts of the cable access
show "Random Acts," for seven years, in addition to having co-founded
the multi-artist alternative film showcase series “Experimentally
ILL,” which has been warmly received by Boston press and audiences alike.
They are recipients of separate "Most Innovative" awards from The
Alliance For Community Media for their creative productions.

###

“Kantian Deontology, Utilitarianism and Ethics of Care"

2009-09-08T17:50:00.000-07:00

“Kantian Deontology, Utilitarianism and Ethics of Care:

A Comparison of Theories, and How They Defend Human Dignity”

By

Michael Phelan O’Toole

(Essay 2)

Mass Bay Community College

Ethics / PH 102

Professor Robert Tarutis

December 17th, 2008

In an effort to better understand what is considered “good,” it is necessary to compare what the ethical theories of utilitarianism, Kantian deontology, and the ethics of care conclude about how one acts morally, and how these different approaches exist as a defense to the concept of our having natural human rights.

Deontology is an ethical approach wherein the morality of actions is based on the motives or intentions behind the action, rather than its actual consequences. This philosophy is based around duty and principle, dealing with human rights. Immanuel Kant believed that, as human beings, we have an obligation to adhere to “the good,” in an unconditional sense. For an action to be deemed right, it must be intrinsically good, and thus should not be altered due to someone perceiving it as otherwise, or the consequence of that good act causing harm to someone or something unintentionally. Kantian deontology says that the intent to do right is what matters, as, in acting according, one is upholding the values of good. Kant argues that the effect of a well-intended action in itself cannot be the motivator for the act, as just as a right choice can lead to tangible positive consequences, there is nothing to stop a wrongfully minded act from somehow paving the way for something good. Kant’s philosophy asks one to consider the potential outcome if every action they took became a universal law. This is his categorical imperative.

The practice of good intention becomes an unwavering thing, as the obligation to always act within reason needs to be applied equally and without prejudice to be effective. The actual outcome of decisions should not be a question, as human beings embracement of “the good” should be constant, and they should see their own actions, and other people as an “end” in themselves, rather than a “means” through consequence. Conversely, with this sense of absolute moral code, Kant endorses scenarios such as a person, with the knowledge that to lie is wrong, giving away the location of a potential victim to a murderer.

This is in contrast with the theory of utilitarianism, which bases moral worth not on intentions, but exclusively the consequences. Specifically, utilitarianism is the idea that, so long as an action amounts to the greatest possible happiness, and thus, harmony among the most people, it is good. Happiness, or pleasure remains it’s main focus, and acting righteously, in order to feel good, make others feel good, and provide the basis for a flourishing society are means to this end. From this approach, in order to determine what is ultimately right, one must foresee what will happen as a result of their decisions and actions. This concludes that, whether intentions are just or foolhardy, the amount of good, or mutually beneficial effects, is what matters. While Kantian deontology grounds itself in dedication to “the good,” deriving from an internal, personal sense of unyielding virtue, regardless of result, utilitarianism is concerned with the good that is actually crafted out of action. While Kant’s theory suggests that you are obligated to do the right thing only, no matter possible pain it causes, utilitarianism is directly linked to making choices that support the functioning satisfaction of others.

Looking at the ethics of care, rather than an approach grounded in universal standard, or the pursuit of higher reasoning, human relationships are put at the forefront. This philosophy is based on nurturance, and recognizes interdependency between human beings, and thus a responsibility to protect and care for others based on real connections, and a general sense of value for human life. From this perspective, “the good” is rooted in positive treatment of our fellow human beings, without prejudice, and going out of one’s way to support the needs of those less fortunate than others. The theory puts a focus on reaching out to, and adequately addressing the individual needs of people who we recognize as important to us in relationships. The cultivation and support of our needs as humans, through unity is what matters here.

All these theories are applicable in defending the idea of human dignity, as, despite their differences in approach, regarding their placement of “the good,” they are primarily focused on constructing a way in which the well-being of all people is encouraged. When applied collectively, they illustrate that we must both govern ourselves through principles of rationality, so as to maintain overall understanding of “the good,” and act on good intention, in order to not succumb to selfishness or expect reward, as well as practice empathy, as it is necessary to put yourself in someone else’s position in realizing we are all worthy of the same things.

Kantian deontology’s intention based concept keeps in mind that we must truly desire to do good, not only for ourselves, but others as well. The application of reason allows us to decide if an action is consistent with what is truly good, and will be most beneficial to all parties. Though consequences remain out of our control, Kant’s idea that we consider what would result if all our own moral actions became universal occurrences, allows us to realize the potential impact of our decisions, and put them in the context of co-existing with other human beings, and subsequently how others actions would affect us.

While a system of standards of reason is helpful, bearing in mind that moral absolutes leave open the possibility of other people being harmed, empathy must be considered as well, as, in practice; there is always an exception to a rule. Ethics of care defend the concept of human dignity not through duty to principle, but through expressly the care and consideration of all people, simply because they are fellow humans, whom we respect. From this perspective, being that we are all similar in being born and charged with living our lives, empathy in itself is only reasonable. We all have the capacity to do right as well as wrong, but it is the ability to overlook discrimination and value another person and their unique potential and personality that is most moral. A principle of good alone should not take precedence over the uniqueness of a person or scenario, given that our existence entitles us to all encompassing rights. With that, Kantian deontology, in the absence of something like the abstract of religion governing the motivations for action, establishes that, being valuable in ourselves, it is simply our duty to not exploit each other.

From a utilitarian stance, by recognizing each person’s immediate value, we respect them enough to address their need for happiness, and thus work to come to the
best compromise which meets all of our preferences for a pleasurable life. Here, promoting the suffering or harm of another human being is wholly wrong, as there is no happiness being gained. Punishment that does not literally help to stop greater negativity does no good, as, a person, being entitled to a good life, is being shamed. If disrespect for the unconditional human rights is being employed, it ultimately advocates the growth of misery in the world. Utilitarianism defends dignity by advocating our right and desire for a pleasurable existence and by focusing on what will be most beneficial to the most people. With this, our human rights are collectively understood and attempted to be met most efficiently.

Through the idea of universal dignity, we, as humans, all deserve to be treated well, and live in a world free from chaos. These theories center on mapping out a way in which we can achieve satisfaction for ourselves, and reach our own goals while being equally considerate of others, or by setting a proper example of the duty we have to operate in favor of what is right. Ideally, one must not impend on another’s wellness, so long as it is congruent with “the good.” This should allow for a prosperous society and, the opportunity for a satisfying existence. The understanding that human life is intrinsically of great worth remains the one bond in defining and motivating the universal grasp of “the good,” regardless of which ethical theory is applied. Indeed, without it the theories of Kantian deontology, utilitarianism, and ethics of care would lose much of their meaning and purpose.

PRESS RELEASE : "D.L. Polonsky's NonViolent Anarchy Film Festival" touring to Providence, RI 9/3/09

2009-08-28T02:03:00.000-07:00

Manic Schematic PR Firm
Mike Phelan O’Toole
Mikeovideo@gmail.com
###-###-#### / ###-###-####
http://www.MikeOToole.net
http://www.DLPolonsky.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Boston Indie Filmmaker, Video Artists Hit The Road To Host
Retrospective, Surreal Film Showcase at The Cable Car Cinema

(Boston, MA, 8/20/09) – Indie filmmaker D.L. Polonsky and video artist
Mike Phelan O’Toole, after a series of acclaimed screenings at
Brookline, MA’s famous Coolidge Corner Theatre, announce the arrival
of "D.L. Polonsky’s Non-Violent Anarchy Film Festival" to Rhode
Island. This Polonsky “career retrospective” showcase will be a two
hour movie screening of eclectic low budget films, animation,
nontraditional music videos and esoteric video art, taking place at
Providence's historic Cable Car Cinema on September 3rd at 9:30PM. The
show will be emceed by O'Toole, noted for his caustic wit in spoken
word performance, and the colorful pun-spouting Polonsky himself. A
lively question and answer session will follow the films. The event is
sponsored in part by prolific Boston video artist and cable access
show producer Lawrence Hollie.

Polonsky’s innovative work dates back to when he was a young boy,
crafting strange and provocative films with his brother, Gabriel. The
event will exhibit a selection of modern work, such as “To Mock a
Killing Bird,” a slapstick anti-war comedy about a
draft-dodger, set from 1972-74, and Midlife Cowboy, wherein, a cowboy,
fed up with our ubiquitous computer culture, indulges in a little of
his own “computer hacking” by smashing a computer with an axe, as well
as older, rare gems, such as “Ersatz;” made in 1974, when D.L. was 13.
This is a short film about a pulp novel writer who carries around her
dead father’s head. A Disease Called Man, a far-out crime drama, stars
O’Toole and Hollie. The film Urban Fairy, about an extraterrestrial
wanting to fly back to his planet, was co-edited by O’Toole and
Polonsky. For more information on the film lineup, “D.L. Polonsky’s
Non-Violent Anarchy Film Festival,” and to arrange interviews, please
contact Mike Phelan O’Toole.

As an Editor’s Pick, Shaula Clark, of The Boston Phoenix, proclaims
Polonsky’s “Nonviolent Anarchy” fest to include "The kind of films
that could revolutionize cinema, nonviolently or otherwise."
Additionally, for those wanting to pin down D.L.’s style, The
Brookline Tab’s Alex Stevens winkingly suggests to "Think David Lynch,
without all the mainstream storytelling."

The showcase comes out of a desire from the trio to expand their live
audience, and reward quality creative efforts that may be overlooked
by more pretentious "festival" outlets, "It's a very D.I.Y, punk
approach. We want to show people that these different works can be
innovative and entertaining, and that the personalities behind them
are just as interesting," says O'Toole. "We saw it was important to
expand outside the Boston area, and we’re really excited to meet a new
audience. D.L.’s flicks are so wild. He deserves to see his work up on
the big screen, live, and so do underground film fans everywhere. The
Q&A afterwards is the best!"

In addition to his video work, Polonsky has made a name for himself in
the Allston area as the anti-Shepard Fairy, plastering his artwork up
wherever it will stick, while simultaneously having had political
portraits published in several major newspapers and magazines.
Additionally, he has had a children's book published that he
wrote/illustrated titled "The Letter Bandits."

Hollie and O'Toole have been advocates of collaborative media, and
purveyors of unique video art, as producers/ hosts of the cable access
show "Random Acts," for seven years, in addition to having co-founded
the multi-artist alternative film showcase series “Experimentally
ILL,” which has been warmly received by Boston press and audiences.
They are recipients of separate "Most Innovative" awards from The
Alliance For Community Media for their creative productions.

The next “Non-Violent Anarchy Film Fest” event, with a fresh lineup,
tours to The Provincetown Art House, in Provincetown, MA, October
24th, 2009.

###

I'm emceeing with D.L. at Nonviolent Anarchy 2, too!

2009-07-14T02:08:00.000-07:00

Hi kids! Come join us for a second go 'round of Nonviolent Anarchy! I'm emceeing again since you all were so great last time, and as for PR, let's see if I can't wrestle up some fresh press for Mr. Polonsky. I'll share more info and stories soon. For now, I wanted to make sure the word was out on this blog. I know this place (http://www.MikeOToole.NET / MikePhelanOToole.com) is a bit of a mess... I'll be cleaning things up at some point soon. For now, just read on and share (I wrote the top half, while D.L. wrote the bottom) :

"Local filmmaker and artist D.L. Polonsky announces the lineup for a SECOND, NEW showcase of his work taking place at The Coolidge Corner Theatre July 23rd, 2009. Now living in the Brookline/Allston area, D.L.'s innovative work dates back to when he was a young boy, crafting strange and provacative films with his brother. The event will exhibit a selection of modern work, as well as older, rare gems.
The show will
be hosted by Polonsky and Mike Phelan O'Toole, a friend and actor of
Polonsky's, noted for his previous involvement in the Coolidge's
"Experimentally ILL" showcase. Press coverage, including interviews is
being sought. Films are available for review upon request,

Email Mike with media questions at mikeovideo@gmail.com

D.L. POLONSKY'S NON-VIOLENT ANARCHY 2

Thurs., July 23rd, 2009 @7 P.M.

Local filmmaker and artist D.L. Polonsky presents a second installment of independent films. Features new work and an encore showing of the animated short "The Flyer". Includes "To Mock a Killing Bird", a surreal comedy about a mailman who escapes to Canada to avoid the draft in 1972. $5 admission. 2 hours. Hosted by Polonsky and Mike Phelan O'Toole.

Praise for Non-violent Anarchy 1:

"Think David Lynch without all the mainstream storytelling."
- Alex Stevens, The Brookline Tab

"Hilarious."
- Daily Calendar, The Weekly Dig

"The kind of films that could revolutionize cinema, nonviolently or otherwise."
- Shaula Clark, Editor's Picks, The Boston Phoenix

In addition to his video work, Polonsky has had a children's book published that he wrote/illustrated titled "The Letter Bandits" and has had his political portraits published in several major newspapers and magazines."

Thanks for reading this, and, again, I'll be sharing more new, cool shit in a little while, and trying to do some regular wordsmithed documenting of our comings and goings, as well as cracking into the matrix that is my mind.

XmX

I'll be co-hosting at D.L. Polonsky’s Nonviolent Anarchy Film Festival 6/25/09

2009-04-21T14:49:00.000-07:00

I'm currently acting in a new film by my director-turned-friend D.L., so I'd thought I'd share this would-be press release I've sent around...
I'll be co-hosting at the gig and am working on promo stuff. My video-making pal Lawrence is helping D.L. get this show on the road, and D.L. is doing his thing to put together a sick lineup. I'm sure he'll be doing his share of guerilla street promotion for it as well. The man is the unsung "Better-than-Shepard-Fairey" multimedia hero of Allston, MA. His story deserves to be told. Come meet, greet, and peep out this great stuff on the big screen in June!

Local filmmaker and artist D.L. Polonsky announces the preliminary
lineup for a showcase of his work taking place at The Coolidge Corner
Theatre June 25th, 2009. Now living in the Brookline/Allston area,
D.L.'s innovative work dates back to when he was a young boy, crafting
strange and provacative films with his brother. The event will exhibit
a selection of modern work, as well as older, rare gems. The show will
be hosted by Polonsky and Mike Phelan O'Toole, a friend and actor of
Polonsky's, noted for his previous involvement in the Coolidge's
"Experimentally ILL" showcase. Press coverage, including interviews is
being sought. Films are available for review upon request,

Email D.L. at d.l.polonsky@hotmail.com
Email Mike with media questions at mikeovideo@gmail.com

D.L. POLONSKY’S NONVIOLENT ANARCHY FILM FESTIVAL

An Evening of the Films of Boston-based Indie Filmmaker D.L. Polonsky

WHEN: Thursday, June 25th, 2009, 7 P.M. – 9 P.M.

WHERE: At The Coolidge Corner Theatre,

290 Harvard St., Brookline, Mass., 02446

$5 admission

LINEUP:

Urban Fairy, (2005). An extraterrestrial finds severed body parts in
this surreal comedy short.

To Mock a Killing Bird, (2006). Slapstick anti-war comedy about a
draft-dodger, set from 1972-74.

Midlife Cowboy, (2007). A cowboy, fed up with our ubiquitous computer
culture, indulges in a little of his own “computer hacking” by
smashing a computer with an axe.

Dream Sequence for A Tree Grows in Brookline, (2008). Surreal montage
of images set to music.

Changing Face from The Human Race, (1983). A poster for a bar comes
alive. Paper cell animation.

Ersatz, (1974). Made when D.L. was 13, this is a short film about a
pulp novel writer who carries around her dead father’s head.

Beyond the Phosphenes, (1982). Paper cell animation of fantasy images.

A Disease Called Man: The Director’s Cut, (2008). While there’s a
killer loose in the neighborhood, potential victims have to deal with
corrupt cops and unethical doctors.

Promo for upcoming 12:54, Half a Dozen of the Other. This
work-in-progress will be a character study at least in part about a
group of people’s delusional reactions to the current recession. Due
out in the Fall of 2009.

Fore more info/media contact :

Email D.L. at d.l.polonsky@hotmail.com
Email Mike at mikeovideo@gmail.com

HEY all! I will be keeping in e-touch more. (new access show, Twitter, Myspace, Facebook, video, writing, etc

2009-03-24T13:20:00.000-07:00

From http://blog.myspace.com/MikeOToole

What's up?! I have been seriously lacks in popping on to really blog-it-out lately. With that, I am checking in on here. How are you Myspace pals? This is really me - not some promo campaign. This reps me the most, so peep out all the links and stuff. I do need to update a lot of information though. This is still my main page, though I've setup another... I am bummed that the "film" profile does not let me do the same things a regular profile does, like mess with the new myspace features such as playlists and easier profile customization, as well as generally blocking me from adding folks I'm into, or maybe keeping me out of searches. Anyway this internet stuff is great when stripped down - I see it as a way for you and I to stay in touch and chat back and forth, sharing stories and cool creations. We're reaching out and sitting down to a nice slice of life,with whatever tech toy as the medium. Let's get a dialouge started here and on http://twitter.com/mikeotoole and oh so many other spots. I will be trying my best to keep updating and populating a lot more. I am going to strive for honesty, in addition to having a blast creating new things for you and I, like my new access show I'm calling "Solipsist's Dispatch," which has debuted on BATV - Brookline Access Television. In addition to playing on the cable airwaves, it's available online. We said screw it, let's create and document some stream of conciousness nonsense, and slab some artistic flair on it. View it at http://batv.org/streaming-video/ondemand/mike-o-ep-2

I've also put up a new video of our boys in the band Midatlantic, whom myself and videography pal Lawrence do video for. Words can't capture the rush I get from shooting and editing something with energy. Peep the vids at http://youtube.com/midatlantictheband
This desire to contribute more may come from the us all feeling a part of something greater in putting on the "Experimentally ILL" alternative film showcase at the mighty Coolidge Corner Theatre. We are a couple weeks removed from the third show, and again were just shy of sold out. Also, at the eleventh hour I struck success in the PR department once again, as Boston's Weekly Dig got in touch, and did a really nice piece on us and the philosophy behind the show. (A screen cap is available in my PRESS photo album on myspace and facebook, as well as http://flickr.com/photos/mikephelanotoole ) A tease for our article was on the cover, right next to a tease about Dan akroyd. On the website, there was my face as part of the tease in the arts and entertainment section, right above a review of Time and Eric of Adult Swim's show. Thanks to Harry Vaughn at the Dig. Regarding the audience, It means so much to me that folks would be so cool and stay to peep out different stuff from so many wacky artists, and then come up to me after, as emcee, and shake hands. I feel like it is a waste of a grand privilage, to not lay myself bare a bit and spill my guts in the way of sharing artistry or just personal thoughts and thank yous with you in the e-world on something of a regular basis. I am proud and awestruck.

Many of my friends whom I care deeply for, I would love to get in their head a bit, as far as what they're into and feeling via e- contribute in the way of video, audio, expressive writing and other works. Nothing against those who keep it simple, but I wanna snap up all this social-networking stuff to make myself more available if I can - I mean if we're gonna spend time on Myspace, Facebook, etc, we might as well open up the floodgates and have more of a virtual representation of who we are and what we do and feel than simply a couple words and a photo. Anyway, I'll be playing with toys to share, and more importantly, get creative conversations going between us, for those who're into that sort of thing.
For now http://MikePhelanOToole.com (getting a makeover soon), Twitter.com/MikeOToole , http://MikeOCast.blogspot.com , and Youtube (more vids soon) at either mikeotoole or midatlantictheband to see my behind the scenes work. Also keep tuned to BATV.ORG for more episodes of the show. More cell-splitting prose and poetry on the way as well (thesoulenigma.livejournal.com) You can also give a go at adding me on Facebook as well, for a whole heaping helping of internet interaction in one place. I have been at the tv station a lot, so I will be churning out more stuff. Possibilities are endless.
Love til later (soon, as I wanted to include more in this update.)
M.

P.S. I just watched myself walk by in My Best Friend's Girl - accross after Dane Cook and Kate Hudson run by in the Running A Marathon chapter on the DVD (in the Boston public gardens area). I am wearing a sweatshirt and backpack. I wrestled with the concept that I put the movie, after I rented it, in the same bag I wear in the flick. That was really nice day. Good times. I've gotta write about that soon. The journal is your friend.

Experimentally ILL 3 press release and info

2009-02-13T14:02:00.000-08:00

Just to share what did not get picked up as of still :

Manic Schematic PR Firm
Mike Phelan O'Toole
781-234-8867
mikeovideo@gmail.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Video Artists Unveil Own Alternative Film Showcase at Coolidge Corner Theatre

(Boston, MA, 1/9/08) – Cable access show producers and local video
artists Mike Phelan O'Toole and Lawrence Hollie announce the third
installment of their "Experimentally Ill" showcase; a two hour movie
screening of eclectic low budget films, animation, music videos and
esoteric video art, taking place at Brookline's historic Coolidge
Corner Theatre on February 26th at 7:00PM. Emceed by O'Toole and
Quincy Brisco of WBCN Boston's "Toucher and Rich" radio program, the
event will exhibit works by O'Toole and Hollie, and other innovative
indie video-makers.

The showcase comes out of a desire from the duo to reward quality
creative efforts that may be overlooked by more pretentious "festival"
outlets, "It's a very D.I.Y, punk approach. We want to show people
that these different works can be innovative and entertaining, and
that the personalities behind them are just as interesting," says
O'Toole. "We saw we needed a bigger stage than simply a TV screen.
This is a love letter to small artists with big visions. The live
energy raises the stakes."

Past screenings have included the Emmy-winning "It's Jerry Time" web
cartoons, films of artist D.L. Polonsky, music videos of rock bands
Uncle Monsterface and Midatlantic and other works. For more on
Experimentally Ill, please contact Mike Phelan O'Toole.

Hollie and O'Toole have been advocates of collaborative media, and
purveyors of unique video art, as producers/ hosts of the cable access
show "Random Acts," for seven years. They are recipients of separate
"Most Innovative" awards from The Alliance For Community Media for
their creative productions.

###

(Seeking interviews for features covering the artists/presenters, and
the event, or event previews, listings, and anything else. A WORD file
of the press release is attached. Alternate PHOTOS for pieces are
available upon request, if a photo shoot is not desired. Many thanks. )

Visit the following links for some previous coverage on past
shows and events.

http://www.wickedlocal.com/needham/news/x1001331782/Needham-resident-promotes-creativity-through-cable-access-show

http://www.metrobostonnews.com/us/article/2008/07/10/02/3327-66/index.xml?print=1

A brief wrieup was also in the Boston Phoenix September 11th, 2008
issue - Arts + Music + Events, pg. 3

Scrapping the dust off this thing...

2008-12-08T11:31:00.000-08:00

Since it has been a bit since the last update, and I am short on time, I offer up a few treats.
Follow me at http://www.twitter.com/MikeOToole
I've been dropping quick updates there for a beat. By the new year, I'll clean this place up and have a new site for you.

Here's some stuff for you to check out.

I asked my buddy Perfect Jimmy of Uncle Monsterface to help me create an image to represent our alternative film showcase. Here is early "Experimentally Ill 3" promo art. The "glaring punk guy" is from "The Misfit Room," hand drawn by D.L. Polonsky. All other work is by James Bernardinelli.

The band I've been doing video work for with my pal Lawrence is called Midatlantic. They open for Letters to Cleo tonight at The Paradise (12/8/08). We may be hitting the place to tape them. Either way, check out the batch of video we've created for them :

Stay tuned to http://www.MikeOCast.blogspot.com for chatter from me soon.
I have been really busy as of late, but I will try to get on there and talk to the phone before the year is out.

Thanks,
M.

Watch I, Mike Phelan O'Toole, Lawrence and Quincy Brisco on Random Acts: A Needham Reunion debut @ 10:30PM

2008-10-11T17:47:00.000-07:00

Watch myself, Lawrence, and the one and only Quincy Brisco on Random Acts: A Needham Reunion debut @ 10:30PM on Needham Channel's Comm Channel - http://needhamchannel.org (replay Mon @ 12:00AM/ Fri 3PM). I have been hosting solo with "Not The End of The World" for a little over a month, but this episode is our official Needham Channel re-debut.

Check out our "New Views" blurb on the Needham Channel site:
http://greisnet.com/tnc.nsf/Page%202!OpenPage&TableRow=1.1.2.1.2#1.1.2.1.

"Random Acts –
You may recall an article which ran in the Needham Times last month about this program. This episode was shot as that article was written, and it has a pretty meta-take on publicity. It is definitely an episode to watch if you are willing to scratch your head a little!"

And here is a link to the article in question :

http://www.wickedlocal.com/needham/news/x1001331782/Needham-resident-promotes-creativity-through-cable-access-show

Stay tuned to http://www.MIKEOCAST.blogspot.com for audio commentary from me!

OTHER TOWNS / TIMES to watch Random Acts on TV :

Random Acts is now on
Newton's NewTV Blue Channel
(Channel 10 on Comcast; Channel 15 on RCN;
Channel 34 on Verizon)
Saturday 10:30pm

Random Acts is now on CCTV Cambridge
Public Access Television. (Channel 10).

(Schedules subject to change without notice.
)
Monday 11:30pm
Wednesday 11:00pm

Random Acts is now on The Needham Community
Channel (Comcast Ch. 9; RCN Ch. 15; Verizon Ch. 29).

Monday 12:00am
Friday 3:00PM
Saturday 10:30pm

Random Acts is now on The Waltham Channel
(Channel 8 on Comcast; Channel 3 on RCN)
Thursday 11:00pm
and various times over the weekend.

Enjoy!!!

Random Acts is now on in Needham and Waltham (MORE UPDATES SOON).

2008-10-10T10:39:00.000-07:00

I am on Random Acts (New) in Needham on the Comm Channel at 3PM today (Friday).
I may even be hanging at the station, in celebration of this new show circling our triumphant return to The Needham Channel, and this new, earlier time slot.

Random Acts is now on
Newton's NewTV Blue Channel
(Channel 10 on Comcast; Channel 15 on RCN;
Channel 34 on Verizon)
Saturday 10:30pm

Random Acts is now on CCTV Cambridge
Public Access Television. (Channel 10).
(Schedules subject to change without notice.)
Monday 11:30pm
Wednesday 11:00pm

Random Acts is now on The Needham Community
Channel (Comcast Ch. 9; RCN Ch. 15; Verizon Ch. 29).
Monday 12:00am
Friday (previously 1:30am) now 3:00PM
Saturday 10:30pm

Random Acts is now on The Waltham Channel
(Channel 8 on Comcast; Channel 3 on RCN)
Thursday 11:00pm
and various times over the weekend.

“Reason and Religion”

2008-09-26T10:30:00.000-07:00

Michael Phelan O’Toole

The Post-Modern World – Question 3.

Human Values, Personal Freedom, and The Arts

Professor Robert Tarutis

May 7th, 2008

In his book, The End of Faith, author Sam Harris examines religious faith and its contention in a modern world in which conscious reason and progressive thought should prevail. He points out how religious faith, however, is not nurturing of simply a greater spiritual connection with the universe, but rather, is gradually stunting greater understanding, through ritualistic repetition. While life within the universe and time are constant and gradually progressive, religious texts remain unchanging, and subsequently foster intellectual stagnation and dependency.

Harris essentially lays out a case that it is not God, acting as a grand disciplinary figure, or an other-worldly battle which will cause the proverbial or literal end the world, but rather our own closed-mindedness in pointless religious disputes and extremism. Interestingly, Harris sees those believing in moderate forms of religion as dangerous as those practicing fanaticism or fascism, as they are, selectively endorsing what, in the full sense, is an antiqued system, which not only promotes ignorance of the tangible modern world, but also violence and guilt. If there was any doubt to his stance, he questions why The Bible, the current source of moral teachings by way of mythic tale, has not yet gone the way of our depiction of Zeus, and his casting lighting bolts from the sky.

Perhaps there is something inside us that wants to believe we are part of a grander system, securely monitored by a creator and protector. This being said, it is possible to experience a feeling of spiritual freedom and connection to the world without religion. Indeed, as Harris emphasizes, religion may have developed partly due to our initially limited knowledge of a grander sense of the world, coupled with our inability to understand how we build conceptualizations in our minds. Though Harris does not disagree that aspects of organized religion provide a forum for personal growth for some and that there are certain emotionally overwhelming experiences that faith can serve greater than conscious logic, he insists that we also reevaluate the negative effects. Not only is the validity of the far out, other-worldly nature of religious scripture of concern, but more so the willful ignorance, and flock mentality that accompanies the understanding that for the majority, such a blind embrace of unverifiable text denotes the shunning of the values of reason, which operate in free form, based upon available phenomena and concrete logic. That is, it is dangerous when the acceptance of an unchanging religious routine replaces questioning and cognitive reasoning, as it allows for the active examination of our world through the open exchange of ideas, and applied progressive methods like science and philosophy. However, it should be noted that, as Harris states, “reason” alone does not shun nor void the possibility of a higher order to the universe. On the contrary, it is reason, when applied equally that allows one to confidently gain a blossoming perspective on what it means to be human.

In contrast, staunch servitude to religious faith requires something even beyond what could be called “suspension of disbelief” to those dedicated to understanding as we know it, as the practice of religion requires a certain endorsement in the fantastical, represented in centuries old text. A belief should be structured around ideas grounded to the same “logical coherence.” The concept that religious belief is designated on a separate plain than the rest of human values, is a problem. Not only do the fantastic events described in scripture evidently not cohere with the post-modern world in a literal sense, but the fact that religion is not openly held to the same level of scrutiny as our studies of history, geography, politics, or any other area of human engagement in mainstream society is a red flag.

To challenge or debate anything under the banner of religion is still considered taboo in our country. Christianity and religion as a whole have become integrated in our culture. Though one would assume that a vast yet eclectic grasp and interest in concrete and applicable human values and history would be of primary concern when electing someone for political office, more often than not the question of faith arises. Whether it is strictly rhetoric or not, certain people want to know that their political representative shares the same belief in how we came to be, and where we go when we die. It is difficult to break away from this dependency on tradition and an antiqued approach to higher understanding and spiritual experience. While many people embrace the conquest of concrete information that fits into a verifiable network of belief, they also practice in religious faith. This is contradictory to the true pursuit of knowledge and self actualization, as, as has been stated, religious faith is held separate and unaccountable for its structure and bias. To willfully co-exist with this system, littered with dangerous advocacy of closed-mindedness and even violence while our current state of growth continues, never acknowledging the flaws and contradictions of faith and scripture, leaves reason in exile. Religion is an elephant in the living room of civilization. While religious faith alone may have served us adequately in some form long ago, it is a
fostered-in tradition which, as Harris states, we need to remove from a pedestal in the same fashion the Greeks did to their ancient gods and expositional texts containing accounts of fantastic figures. Harris writes of this not to forward a personal agenda, but in addressing the grander consequences of judgmental and extreme thought processes based on faith. He sees religious belief as a structure built on a primitive people’s failure to understand our inability to separate our minds’ objective versus subjective interpretations of the world. Additionally, use of mythical stories to explain creation and teach ethical values were used in many cultures before the The Bible and recorded birth of Christ. These accounts either died with a civilization, or were decidedly categorized as developed story. To say that one particular religious text is historically accurate, let alone composed by a divinity, directly or indirectly, is impossible by today’s standards of reason. The issue mainly becomes not that someone would believe that Adam and Eve existed simply by the hand of an ominous father figure, and talked with a serpent, or that Mohammed flew to heaven on a winged horse, but why and how they come to believe it.

Harris addresses the concept of a non-universal experience, in that our brains form differently, and subsequently our susceptibility to formulating what surmounts to truth is subjective. He also notes the possibility of external influence, whether through emotional experience, or mind altering substance. Also, in breaking down our thoughts which make up beliefs, we have to break down our language, as we do think in language; the quality of our thoughts and ideas can only be as clear as the quality of our language. This is to say that to “believe” in something is quite different than to “know.” To know is to be able to assert existence by way of verifiable phenomena, either by physical presence, or gradual theory based on a connection to something else time tested to be identified as true. It is purely unrealistic that religion can exist unchanging, in a world that, by its very nature, is constantly in flux. While a devoted follower can argue that events told in scripture occurred as they believe, there exists that ever widening gap, in that they simply do not occur under the same banner of logical coherence and physics as we now know. Therefore, what does it say about individuals who devote their lives to ceremony based upon a world that operated on an entirely different set of standards of physical law than the one they currently live in? Do the ethical teachings remain the same? If they do, as certainly there are noted universal feelings tied to the human experience, it seems unnecessary to bound them to a world nonexistent to those that do not believe religion to be the ultimate truth, and to those that do, it is at best a fantastic world no longer visible.

Through group-think, those of religious faith have been conditioned to not question, in fear of punishment and hope of reward, or in moderate acceptance, have succumbed to the traditions of past. In the modern world, with a network of logical coherence that defines the way our universe came to be and operates, and a greater hold on spiritual and mystic experience, as well as how the human mind works, religion is a relic which will only serve to destroy us. Not only is the promotion of intolerance and judgmental behavior of concern, but in the age of weapons of mass destruction, the “war of ideas” between faith and reason has ever presently devolved into a true siege of violence.

"EXPERIMENTALLY ILL 2" : An Indie Showcase of Alternative Film (UPDATE)

2008-09-05T13:33:00.000-07:00

Updates! Press is okay.

(Previously we received coverage for the first "Experimentally Ill" -
featured (interview/event preview) in Metro Boston's entertainment
section, pg. 13 of the 7/10/08 edition - "License to ILL" by Sarah Shanfield. http://www.metrobostonnews.com/us/article/2008/07/10/02/3327-66/index.xml?print=1
)

A bigger, two page article, with, me, Mike Phelan O'Toole on the front page of The Needham Times paper in their "Week of 9/3 " edition is out now, available online at
http://www.wickedlocal.com/needham/news/x1001331782/Needham-resident-promotes-creativity-through-cable-access-show

"EXPERIMENTALLY ILL 2" : An Indie Showcase of Alternative Film

A little piece of insanity returns to the historic Coolidge Corner
Theatre at 290 Harvard Street in Brookline, MA, as spoken word
performer, Vh1 hopeful, actor and video artist Mike Phelan O'Toole and
cable access
legend and WBCN radio personality Quincy Brisco (of the Toucher and
Rich Show) host a brand new entertaining, eclectic D.I.Y. filmic
tapestry!

If funky animation, quirky cult flicks, comedy and non-pretentious art
movies sound cool to you, sit back and relax in the Coolidge's
incredible Video Screening Room from 7-9PM on Thursday, the eleventh
of September, 2008! This venue welcomes us back for another big live
event, featuring visually stunning, odd and entertaining underground
films, video shorts, music videos, and live action tomfoolery with a
crew of unique personalites like no other. Admission is two dollars to
help allow future shows. The first "Experimentally Ill" was very
popular, so plan to arrive early.

Peep out moving images never before screened at the Coolidge! Marvel
as special guest speakers provide A's for your Q's after the
screening!

And what flicks and which guests are in store for you this time 'round? Read on:

*Collaborations from Mike Phelan O'Toole and Lawrence Hollie's "Random
Acts" community television show

*A spoken word audio performance by Mike Phelan O'Toole, coupled with
videography of model Jennifer Mitchell. Videography by Lawrence Hollie.

*The best, most colorfully insane of Quincy Brisco's "Quincy's Perspective"

*Orrin Zucker and Jerry Zucker's EMMY-winning "It's Jerry Time!"
animations (of the ongoing web series "It's Jerry Time!")

*Local artist/writer/filmmaker D.L. Polonsky's surreal comedy "Urban
Fairy," edited by Mike Phelan O'Toole, and starring special guest for
the evening, Richard Berman.

*Sketch comedy shorts and the docu/mocumentary "Burning Ambition of A
Solutionist - A Love Story" by comedy team "The Peanut Butter
Solutionists" (Trevor Martin and Conor Sullivan)

*The world premiere of a far-out visual collage, "Indie-visuality" by
D.L. Polonsky

*James Bernardinelli's cult sensation series "Perfect Jimmy Gone
Wild," featuring avant-garde sketch comedy and surreal, hilarious
animation

*Mike Clement's latest wacky puppetry, laced with biting social commentary!

*Jesse Kreitzer's "Pearlswig" documentary about Boston's forty year
veteran, #1 celebrity autograph hound and paparazzi - Jerome
Pearlswig.

*Lauren Rossi's psychedelic visual journey "Outer Layers," and
experimental documentary/reality-based pieces.

*DJ Benny Appell's commentary and comedy "The Price Is Wrong" music video

*Dom Portalla's short films "Jimmy's Birthday," "Double Date," and more.

*The inspiring insanity of "Monsterface TeeVee" by muli-media rock and
sock extravaganza band Uncle Monsterface

*A comedy horror film "The Leaves" by Andrew Eldridge

*A horror thriller - the award-winning "Denoucement"

*The debut of the video created by Lawrence Hollie and Mike Phelan
O'Toole for rising Boston and Ireland rock band MidAtlantic (formerly
The Bleedin Bleedins)'s song "Shine"

And more to be announced!
Line-up subject to change.

e-mail mikeovideo@gmail.com for more info or press interviews.

Visit MikePhelanOToole.com , Youtube.com/Captureman,
Youtube.com/randomacts73, MySpace.com/MikeOToole, and
MikeOCast.blogspot.com for news as it breaks!
Visit http://coolidge.org for venue info and directions.

The dust has settled a bit...

2008-07-17T12:56:00.000-07:00

Hey all,
I am still getting over what myself and crew now simply refer to as "The tenth" in our personal history books, but I wanted to at least touch base on here.
Our inaugural Coolidge Corner Theatre show under the "Experimentally Ill" banner that went down on 7/10/08 was, in brief, an astounding blast and a resounding knockout in our attempt to contend with the giants! Look for the Metro Boston press clippings here soon. If you can't wait for those, visit http://www.myspace.com/mikeotoole

I will be composing a detailed recap of the before, during, and after of the gig very soon. A few photos were taken as well that should turn up in the coming weeks. Thank you to the awesome audience! With this screening such a big success for us, it's my pleasure to share this with you...

The NEXT Experimentally Ill: An Indie Showcase of Alternative Film.
takes place the eleventh of September,
7:00PM at The Coolidge Corner Theatre,
290 Harvard St, Brookline, MA
Support future shows with $2.00 for two solid hours of awesome!

I will check in online again soon with more info!

Mike Phelan O'Toole.

"EXPERIMENTALLY ILL" : An Indie Showcase of Alternative Film (FREE) on 7/10

2008-07-04T22:55:00.000-07:00

Here is the latest, updated press description:

7/10: "EXPERIMENTALLY ILL" : An Indie Showcase of Alternative Film (FREE)
(209 Harvard Street at 7:00PM)

A little piece of insanity comes to the historic Coolidge Corner
Theatre at 209 Harvard Street in Brookline, MA, as VH1 hopeful and
multimedia maven/spoken word artist Mike Phelan O'Toole, cable access legend and WBCN
radio personality Quincy Brisco, and uber-producer and editor extraordinaire Lawrence Hollie host an eclectic, artistic, entertaining, and flat-out hilarious filmic tapestry!

If funky animation, quirky cult flicks, comedy and non-pretentious art
movies sound cool to you, sit back and relax in the Coolidge's
incredible Video Screening Room from 7-9PM on Thursday, July 10th,
2008! This new venue houses our biggest live event, featuring visually
stunning, odd and entertaining underground films, video shorts, and
live action tomfoolery with a crew of unique personalites like no
other. Admission is FREE!!!

Peep out moving images never before screened at the Coolidge! Marvel
as special guest speakers provide A's for your Q's after the
screenings!

And what flicks and which guests are in store for you? Read on:

*Collaborations from Mike Phelan O'Toole and Lawrence Hollie's "Random
Acts" community television show

*Quincy Brisco's film noir piece "Watching The Detective"

*D.L. Polonsky's Luddite comedy "Midlife Cowboy", the world premiere
of D.L. Polonsky's new crime drama "A Disease Called Man"

*Tom Laskowski's cool, social commentary thriller "A Patriot Act."

*James Bernardinelli's crude and hilarious 'Kingdom Rebels" cartoons

and more!

e-mail mikeovideo@gmail.com for more info or press.

Visit http://www.MikePhelanOToole.com , http://www.Youtube.com/Captureman, http://www.MySpace.com/MikeOToole, and
http://www.MikeOCast.blogspot.com for news as it breaks! Visit http://www.Coolidge.org for venue info and directions.

Updates: Quincy back on ’BCN 5/28 and Our Next Live Event 7/10

2008-05-21T18:07:00.000-07:00

Hey all. My apologies for not writing, or keeping you updated for awhile... Something big was on the horizon and I had to focus on it, but alas it was swallowed up by the monster that is show biz. Maybe I'll get to writing of it later on, but until then, we continue in our multi-media assault and quest for legitimacy among the giants. Even though, in attempting to cement my spot I have to lay it all on the line myself and that ground work is what truly matters, I am fortunate to have a great team of talented friends behind me to collaborate with when I can focus on independant things. A lot is in the works, and the gears are always turning... Contending in the bigger picture is the challenge, yet I am up for it, because the alternative is never trying, and that is the true loss. Anyway, here are some red letter days on our end.

On Wednesday, May 28th, my friend entertainer Quincy Brisco makes his triumphant return, and third appearance, on The Toucher and Rich Show on WBCN 104.1 FM Boston. He will have his own segment at 4:30PM EST, which myself and uber-producer Lawrence Hollie are helping him organize. If you are not in the Massachusetts area, visit http://www.WBCN.com and listen to the live stream. Big thanks go to Quincy's family, WBCN management and the Toucher and Rich staff for the opportunity.

Attempting to live the dream.

Here is an early write-up for our NEW live event (stay tuned to MikeOCast.blogspot.com for updates on this and more)

"EXPERIMENTALLY ILL" : An Indie Showcase of Alternative Film For The Ages

A little piece of insanity comes to the historic Coolidge Corner Theatre at 209 Harvard Street in Brookline, MA, as VH1 hopeful and multimedia maven Mike Phelan O'Toole, cable access legend and WBCN radio personality Quincy Brisco, and uber-producer and editor extraordinaire Lawrence Hollie host an eclectic, artistic, entertaining, and flat-out hilarious filmic tapestry!

If funky animation, quirky cult flicks, comedy and non-pretentious art movies sound cool to you, sit back and relax in the Coolidge's incredible Video Screening Room from 7-9PM on Thursday, July 10th, 2008! This new venue houses our biggest live event, featuring visually stunning, odd and entertaining underground films, video shorts, and live action tomfoolery with a crew of unique personalites like no other.

Peep out moving images never before screened at the Coolidge! Marvel as special guest speakers provide A's for your Q's after the screenings!

And what flicks and which guests are in store for you? Read on:

*Collaborations from Mike Phelan O'Toole and Lawrence Hollie's "Random Acts" community television show

*Lawrence Hollie's epic "Captain Zap in The Lost Dimension of Kerr"

*Quincy Brisco's film noir piece "Watching The Detective"

*D.L. Polonsky's film "A Day And A Half"

And more to be announced! If you would like to submit something, or have an act, e-mail mikeovideo@gmail.com

Visit MikePhelanOToole.com , YouTube.com/Captureman, MySpace.com/MikeOToole, and MikeOCast.blogspot.com for news as it breaks! Visit http://coolidge.org for more info and directions.

Until later,
your friend Mike-O
Mike Phelan O'Toole

Special Announcement : entertainer Quincy Brisco to be on WBCN’s Toucher & Rich show!

2008-04-11T12:36:00.000-07:00

My good friend, entertainer and showbiz enthusiast Quincy Brisco is scheduled to be featured / interviewed on The Toucher and Rich Show on Monday, April 14th in the 6:00PM hour (EST)! If you live in the Massachusetts area, tune in on your radio at 104.1 FM WBCN. If you are located anywhere else, go online at WBCN.com and listen to the live stream on your computer! Lawrence Hollie and I, Mike Phelan O'Toole will be in the house as well. It should be a blast to hear Quincy shine. You’re welcome to call in or leave instant feedback at http://WBCN.com regarding your favorite television personality/karoake singer/Comedian/Human tornado - Quincy Brisco!

Thanks so much. If you don’t know Quincy, please support my friend and visit http://youtube.com/QuincyBrisco and the myspace page I run for him, http://myspace.com/QuincyBrisco

Working with this guy has been a ride, and I would dearly appreciate your support here. -M.

"Comedy and the Marx Brothers in A Night at the Opera"

2008-03-26T15:07:00.000-07:00

*Originally writeen 5.10.06 for an Intro to Film course

Comedy, although generally categorized as a film genre, is difficult to precisely define, as there can not only be films strictly based around general comedy as their structure, but also war comedies, horror comedies and more variants of other traditional genres with comical undertones. Therefore it is possible to call comedy a “mega-genre,” broken down into various sub-categories of approach, such as slapstick comedy, which relies heavily on physical gags and timing, screwball comedy, comedy of manners, and parodies. Under the large heading of comedy, all these different types are given their own presence. However, again, any major film genre permits a comic style.

Comedy in film existed from the very beginning of cinematography. In particular, the Lumiere brothers’ L’Arroseur Arrose film, which premiered in 1895 in Paris, is credited with being the first movie to stage the scene in which a child steps on a gardener’s hose, preventing the water flow, and when the gardener puts the hose up to his face to see what’s wrong with it, the child steps off the hose, making water spray in the gardener’s face. Distinction in comedy oriented films can also be made through the utilization of having a main comic figure be focused on throughout a film, as the sole source of comedy in one form or another, and a film which chooses to rather focus on a particular comic style or event which generally effects situations and people.

Yet another different approach used in the history of comedy in films, is a choice between the dominance of physical comedy and action, or the focus on comical dialogue, one-liners, witty observations and a general emphasis on the importance of the characters’ spoken word. Beyond pure sight gages, comedy surrounding “verbal situations” engages the viewer, while simultaneously making them think. (Daniel Lopez 55)
One film in particular that I feel combines both elements of physical comedy, as well as a great emphasis on wit and spoken word is the classic Marxs brothers’ film, A Night at the Opera. Originally written by James Kevin McGuinness, with the screenplay penned by George S. Kaufman and Morrie Ryskind and starring the three most widely known Marx brothers, Groucho, Chico and Harpo Marx, and Margaret Dumont as Mrs. Claypool, Kitty Carlisle as Rosa Castaldi, and Allan Jones as Ricardo Baroni, the 1935 film revolves around a simple plot, yet manages to pull off comic brilliance through original dialogue and tremendous sight gages, crafting a sure-fire formula for overall comic genius (Imdb.com). Rosa Castaldi and Ricardo Baroni are two young opera singers. Both are in love with each other and wish to sing on stage together. Despite their equally impressive talent, Ricardo does not hold enough of a reputation in the high opera society to be considered for a part opposite his real life love. Through several comical tactics, overcoming the obstacles before them, together the Marx brothers create the right circumstances, wherein the normal male singer is replaced with Ricardo, allowing him to sing with Rosa, and illustrate his talents on a prime time scale.

A Night at the Opera exemplifies the ideal comedy, as it employs hilarious sight gages, such as the famous ship Stateroom scene, where various maids and room service, along with Chico, Harpo and Ricardo as stowaways on the opera’s cruise ship, cluster into Groucho's already hilariously small cabin, coincidently offering their services all at once. Meanwhile the room becomes so crowded that when the Mrs. Claypool character opens the door, the mass of people spill on top of her, before the scene fades out. Other outstanding sight gage based scenes include Harpo, climbing up the opera’s set in attempt to get away once it is found out he is a stowaway. This scene includes him climbing up ropes above the set’s scaffolding, and dropping sandbags on his apprehenders’ heads, as he swings form rope to rope in a trapeze-like fashion. However the staple of any of the Marx brothers’ films always couples great dialogue and witty quotables in conjunction with their jaw-dropping slapstick humor. A Night at the Opera offers plenty, such as this from Groucho, in response to hearing the amount of money offered for the opera’s main tenor to sing; “You're willing to pay him a thousand dollars a night just for singing? Why, you can get a phonograph record of Minnie the Moocher for 75 cents. And for a buck and a quarter, you can get Minnie.”

Again, the coupling of fast-paced, intelligently timed physical comedy, as well as unparallel witty dialogues and the energetic dynamic between the characters pull A Night at the Opera together, to an almost astonishing degree. I believe this film best illustrates the vast possibilities of comedy as a genre that can endure the test of time, if executed properly. I feel outright hilariousness, merged with an aura of intelligence and self-awareness in the character interactions makes a great comedy, and the Marx brothers’ A Night at the Opera lives up to this and more, cementing it as one of their masterworks, and an icon in the comedy genre’s history in movies.

Works Cited

Comedy segment :
Lopez, Daniel. Films by Genre. McFarland and Company Publishing. 1993

A Night at the Opera cast/crew info :
http://www.IMDB.com, A Night at the Opera. Visited on 5/9/06.

Some News

2008-03-07T13:20:00.000-08:00

Hey, all.
Here is a quick update. You're welcome to check out http://thesoulenigma.livejournal.com and http://MySpace.com/MikeOToole for anything else. I will also be doing a more extensive audio update via the infamous http://MikeOCast.blogspot.com in a bit. Tonight though, it is all about NowLive - Mike-O Radio! Visit http://MikeORadio.blogspot.com and http://NowLive.com/MikeOToole to listen, chat, and call in live Fridays at 9:00PM Est/ 6:00PM Pst.

On the TV side of things, as you know I have been doing a lot with my buddy Lawrence, and his local show "Random Acts." We are shooting more stuff for it, as well as sending off audition tapes for various things.Random Acts: Mike O'Toole Forever will be telecast on NewTV for the rest of this month and all of April starting this Saturday at 10:30pm. It started airing in Cambridge this past Tuesday and will be showing again this Thursday. This episode of Random will be telecast on CCTV for the next two months as well in order to give folks a chance to catch it.
Here are the official time listings :
TiVO Mike-O:

“Random Acts” Showtimes:

Cambridge, MA: CCTV (channel 10)
Tuesdays at 8:00PM
Thursdays at 11:00PM

Boston / Brookline, MA: Comcast (channel 12)
Weekends at 1:30AM
Thursdays at 1:00AM

Newton, MA: NewTV (Blue channel)
Saturdays at 10:30PM

If you don't do not live in MA, check back for more videos on http://youtube.com/captureman and http://youtube.com/mikeotoole , as well as streaming stuff and live broadcasts at http://justin.tv/mikeotoole
Write me at mikeovideo@gmail.com for show requests or anything else.
There is more to cover, but I don't want to cram it all in here. The main thing is for you to check out the TV show and participate in the internet radio fiasco!

"Mise en scene and Alfred Hitchcock's ROPE."

2008-02-06T12:06:00.001-08:00

(*Originally written as the final to my Intro to Film course.)

Mike O’Toole

Jayson Baker

Introduction to Film

16 May 2007

Film Final Paper : Mise en scene and ROPE

Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope examines sociopathic tendencies and subsequently, the makeup of a fascist philosophy, in the sociological context of a modern aristocratic class. In the midst of their homosexual subtext, the film’s two protagonists, Phillip, and the domineering Brandon, serve to elicit both the disgust and intrigue of the spectator. In order to help communicate the theme of psychological tension and manipulation the two characters initiate, the film employs a multitude of unique techniques and symbolism in its mise en scene that serve to elicit associated emotions within the viewer. As spectator, we are manipulated by the mise en scene, and contained symbolism, in the same fashion that Brandon and Phillip manipulate their guests.

The central symbol throughout the film is, arguably, the chest in which the murdered David rests; representing psychological manipulation and physical vulnerability. Although we are, for the majority of the time, detached from the scene, looking in from behind the chest, at the same time our eyes are consistently drawn to it, as it taunts and teases the spectator in anticipation of the characters’ discovery of its gruesome contents. In one scene in particular, Mrs. Wilson is shown clearing off the makeshift buffet from the chest, with the camera positioned close-up, so that the chest itself is the focal point, with Mrs. Wilson bobbing in and out of the left side of the frame. As she quietly removes items off the surface, we hear Phillip banter back and forth with Rupert, denoting that he is unaware of how close Mrs. Wilson is to the possibility of discovering the body (Hitchcock). The contrast of her silence in the foreground and the camera’s continued stasis versus the two men’s background chatter and unseen action subsequently elicits an equally contrasting set of emotions in the viewer; both a positive anticipation in awaiting the reveal of Brandon and Phillip’s act, and an anxiety toward what will be found and how the characters could react.

In another outstanding scene, whilst playing the piano, Phillip is approached by Rupert and questioned regarding the whereabouts of David, and how Phillip has been acting strangely that evening. Becoming overly defensive and visibly anxious, Phillip eventually breaks down from dodging Rupert’s interrogation effort and ceases his piano-playing. In the midst of otherwise quite, his metronome is heard, ticking back and forth (Hitchcock). This device serves to build the tension in the scene, not only for the characters, but the spectator as well, as it emphasizes what is now a genuinely awkward, painful silence between Rupert and Phillip. Additionally, the lone sound of the metronome denotes a “ticking clock” device, underlining what could be read as Rupert’s assurance of what really is going on, and thus the defining moment in Brandon and Phillip’s time beginning to run out. Another aspect of this scene that contains heavy visual symbolism lies in the metronome being situated between Phillip and Rupert, swaying back and forth between them. This seems to represent what becomes a power struggle, not only to gain control in their particular emotional exchange in this scene, but to take control overall, and assert intellectual dominance.

A third scene which emphasizes the theme of manipulation occurs when we see Mr. Kentley, David’s father, carrying the bundle of books given to him by Brandon and Phillip. In motion, the camera pans along with him, gradually focusing on only the books themselves, highlighting the fact that Brandon has tied the books together with the same rope used to kill David, the man’s own son. Brandon seems delighted at this concept, while Phillip is disturbed (Hitchcock). Not only is this a shining example of how sick Brandon in particular is, and a shocking scene for the viewer, but the visual focus on the books also symbolically exemplifies the ignorance of Mr. Kentley, and all their guests, with the exception of Rupert. The rope is representative of David’s manipulation and subsequent death, and the books representing “knowledge” or the truth itself. Coupled together, the rope keeping the books closed and tied tight, it stands for Phillip and Brandon’s control of the situation early on, as opposed to later scenes involving the more aware Rupert, like the scene involving Phillip and the metronome.

Within Rope, a seemingly simple concept is taken to innovative extremes. In it’s handling of mise en scene, we are not only exposed to themes of manipulation and fascism in its plot, but we too feel the rising tension, and the psychological and emotional ups and downs of the characters. Reviewing the three scenes looked at prior; we see how important mise en scene is to a film like Rope, with each scene containing a central object that elevates the scene’s function in communicating a greater idea or emotion. Without Mrs. Wilson clearing off what we know to be David’s tomb, amidst casual conversation, the fear and anticipation of her unveiling what is inside would not be nearly as apparent. Likewise, without Phillip’s metronome assisting the audible crescendo of he and Rupert’s charged exchange into an eerie almost-silence, and its pendulum-like swinging, that scene would lack a pivotal piece of its unforgettable tension and representation of their stuggle for control. Similarly, in the scene wherein Mr. Kently is shown retrieving his books, the illustration of Brandon and Phillip’s sickness, as well as the entire rope/books metaphor would be nonexistent. With all this, it is purely evident that without the clever mise en scene techniques of Rope, much, if not all, of the film’s powerful messages and emotional twist-turns would fall short as well.

Works Cited :

Hitchcock, Alfred, Rope, Warner Bros., 1948

"Movement Alfred Hitchcock’s ROPE."

2008-02-06T12:06:00.000-08:00

(*Originally written for my Intro to Film course)

Mike O’Toole

Jayson Baker

Introduction to Film

1 March 2007

Protocol Paper #3: Movement and ROPE

In Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope, due to the nature of the entire film taking place in one setting in real time, with its intentionally minimalist approach to editing, the spectator is forced to view and analyze the technical and contextual elements in a more subtle manner than typical of motion pictures today. Without relying on fast cuts, montages, or any other facet of complexity in execution, Hitchcock has left us with a movie which is dependant on every last word of dialogue in order to communicate the plot line and emotions of the characters, and simple camera movement to communicate themes via the analyzed grammar of film technique. The camera itself acts as a spectator throughout the film, ease-dropping on the various characters’ conversations. Regardless if a dialogue is meant to be private, the spectator is consistently either following from room to room, or when in stasis, is viewing the scene from behind the central object of the film; this being of course the chest which Brandon and Phillip choose to place David’s body in, and later serve their buffet off. The camera acting in a third person point of view, coupled with the picture taking place in seamless, real time, drives home the fact that even the most delicate of camera movement serves to add a more colorful purpose to any scene in Rope.

Although there are many scenes that could be dissected, the most outstanding example of the literal nature of this technique of motion conveying a greater theme found in the plot, takes place in a scene toward the ultimate conclusion, wherein Brandon’s ego gets the best of him, in asking Rupert how he would go about committing such a murder, or what Brandon and Phillip called a “perfect murder.” This scene begins in a static shot, with both Brandon and Rupert in the dominant contrast of the frame. Rupert’s dialogue in answering Brandon becomes something of a narrative for the subsequent camera motion; essentially, the camera, as spectator, begins to pan away from both Brandon and Rupert, “pantomiming” the locations in the room which Rupert describes he would direct David, before killing him. (Hitchcock). His description is nearly identical to what Brandon and Phillip actually did, symbolizing a “meeting of the minds,” with the exception of how Rupert would dispose of the body, allowing the possibility of being seen, and thus facing imperfection. Theme-wise, although at this point Rupert is fairly sure that Phillip and Brandon have killed David, he is reluctant to address the possibility of his body being inside the chest. Instead he describes that he would take the body outside and stuff it in his car. From here, the camera avoids focusing on the chest in the room; instead, staying off Brandon and Phillip, it continues to pan all the way to the door. This motion symbolizes both what is Rupert’s reluctance to open his mind to the fact that they indeed did kill David. Although the very intelligent Rupert certainly may have considered placing the body in the chest, he did not want to accept the idea of committing such a crime. This the camera omitting the chest from the shot, and instead fluidly panning toward the door, or the exit from which Rupert says he would hypothetically move toward. This could also represent his anxiety toward the situation, feeling an urge to exit the situation and deny the likelihood of its realism.

Throughout the film, Brandon and Phillip reference how in their past Rupert would often talk about how a superior intellectual should and could commit a perfect murder, himself included. Brandon especially wanting to prove himself better than Rupert, sought out to commit such a murder. Having done it, Brandon and the more reluctant Phillip bask in what they see as finally initiating their superiority over their former teacher, Rupert; while Rupert would simply discuss and hypothesize about the philosophy of intellectuals being able to kill off those inferior, they have indeed done it. This concept of ceasing simply talking about what Rupert essentially sees as a “thought experiment” and exercise in radical questioning of structures of modern sociology, and actually putting it into action, makes Brandon and Phillip feel above he. In actuality this is the opposite case, as Rupert explains that while he does not understand how the world and certain people operate, calling it a “cold, dark place,” his words regarding murder were merely exercises and fodder for philosophical discussion. He states that, while he enjoys these sorts of thought experiments, that’s all they are. There was always something in him that kept him from ever entertaining actually putting them into practice. This is due to what seems to be Rupert’s penchant for pure intellectual stimulation and wisdom, while the killers that became Brandon and Phillip, merely sought to use their knowledge against others, to hurt, and simply to attempt to gain attention and a sense of superiority in order to compensate for insecurity toward their character and intellect.

Works Cited :

Hitchcock, Alfred, Rope, Warner Bros., 1948

"Efficiency and McDonaldization (Cable Access)."

2008-02-06T11:42:00.000-08:00

(*Oringally written for my Human Values course)

9/13/07

Human Values, Personal Freedom and the Arts

Reading Response #1

Although the goal of efficiency in operation is to arrive at the optimum conclusion by way of the quickest, easiest of actions, within our bureaucratic society, administrative protocol is often preferred over unique, individual interpretation or interaction. Although there may be a particular formula that happens to work best at a certain time, it is important not to allow that system to become so ridged in our minds that it begins to control us and ultimately cease new and innovative thought.

Within my job setting – a community television station - I have seen how this school of thought can begin. What initially seems like an organizational necessity only has spread like crippling bacteria. It is important to note that in the community television, or “cable access” environment, beyond a few on-air channel protocols, there is little imposed “McDonaldization,” as generally each town and city is allowed to oversee their own station how they see fit, and technically is not held to FCC regulations. With this flexibility, in the best of scenarios, the station maintains a non-corporate feel, while offering opportunities for education in all venues of video production, and emphasizing all parties’ rights to free speech regarding the content they decide to create. However, what I have witnessed at this particular location, is that such freedom is overturned for structure; volunteers are offered less opportunity to work on all aspects of their production, as staff members are assigned to assist them, essentially to justify their paid position, thus preventing the volunteer producer from gaining as much hands on knowledge and training as is possible. Also, more content has been censored, not due to official FCC standard, but simply by what the staff deems could be not to the taste of the community. All this coupled with the over implementation of paper work is contradicting the true freedom and nature of public access television. Although these procedures were initially implemented in effect to provide efficiency of operation, it in essence has created an environment where public access television production becomes less “accessible,” losing its “human quality.”

"Letter on The Draft."

2008-02-06T11:29:00.000-08:00

(*Originally a "hypothetical" essay written for my Critical Thinking course)

Regarding Congressman Charles Rangel's possible plans to introduce legislation aimed at reinstating the U.S. Military draft, I would advise you, Jay Donato, to strongly appose such a thing, as a member of the House. Assuming that this bill makes it to congress, I ask that you swiftly vote no on it. I believe that the rallying for this reinstatement is purely a reactionary measure, given the current situation in Iraq, with numerous U.S. military causalities daily, and the president's approval rating at record lows. As more and more United States citizens come to the realization that our current war was enacted on false pretences, as well as witness the poor physical and mental condition of our returning troops and subsequent lack of government support delivered, tolerance is waning. With lack of consistent support from its own citizens, the government is forced to call back previous volunteer troops for service.

Not only would this bill impose upon our modern freedom of choice regarding military service, but it would also hurt the strength of the military, and our country's image, rather than so justly support it, as others may claim. With our current volunteer army suffering, having a nonnegotiable draft, although providing the government with a consistent increase in muscle within Iraq, and in general, would substantially lower the overall moral of our country's armed forces. This is only logical, as both protestors of the war, as well as previous supporters, and "arm chair quarterback" military boosters would now be required to serve. With backing of the president and belief in just premise of our presence in Iraq gradually shrinking, it is almost certain that, by the time this bill could be passed, the majority of citizens drafted to military service in Iraq would strongly not only not support the war, but organize a revolt against their required service. Simply put, although, yes, we as citizens have a responsibility to serve our country in a time of war, it is irresponsible and inappropriate on the part of our United States Congress to vote in place a mandatory call to military service, in the midst of a war so openly surrounded by controversy, and in opposition by our country's own citizens. If this legislation were put up for vote and passed, we, as individual Americans, would quite literally be strong-armed into fighting a war that most fail to support, and was never our own to begin with.

Although our current volunteer army may not be the most "convenient" for our government officials at the moment, given their more limited number of soldiers, I feel it is the one with the most integrity. Regardless of my feelings toward our current administration of the war, I must admire the courage and strength that our volunteer troops possess, especially with the continued scrutiny of the war ongoing. A military assembled by lottery may provide the U.S. administration with more feet on the ground in Iraq, and a large revolving number of men and women available for service, but, consequently, it will then inevitably face the rigors of a proportionate number of increased causalities as direct result. At any other time in history, this would be considered an equal sacrifice for our men and women to have made and for us as a country to be willing to make, in comparison to the massive nature of the cause being fought for. However, within the context of Iraq, and the cloudiness of the Bush Administration leading us in its midst, I feel it is purely unfair to not only ask us to serve and sacrifice for something like the Iraq War, but to, bluntly, force us into it. A vote in support of a draft, given our country's current unnecessary circumstances, and resulting instability, is not only wrong on paper, but, in consideration of the concurring lives that would be lost as a result of that vote, is inhumane. It is for these reasons that I passionately request that you, Jay Donato, rightfully deny Charles Rangel's legislation, should it make its way to congress in January, 2007. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Mike Phelan O'Toole.

Mike O'Toole

Critical Thinking 100

Massbay: Fall 2006

Professor Donato

P M I : The Draft

PLUS: - Assumingly, there would never be a great shortage of troops at any one time.

- Those who would've not normally chosen to be involved in the military would get a chance to see how things operate from the inside, as well as reap any benefits from their service.

- Although their service may be involuntary, upon completion, more people would receive the financial benefits given out by the government (whereas, if they had not been put in a position to serve, they would not have those benefits, etc.) More troops (involuntary) involved may mean an increase in benefits (given to either the soldiers themselves, or the family's of causalities.

- May increase a feeling of unity as a country or people to those involved.

MINUS: - Imposes upon our freedom of choice (regarding military service)

- Troops as a whole would have a poorer moral, as most may not want to be involved with the military, or more directly, a war (Iraq War, etc.)

- Would proportionately increase the number of U.S. causalities (more troops involved in war, thus more lost, etc)

INTERESTING: - It would be interesting to see how U.S. citizens, as well as other countries, react, should the draft be reinstated. – It would also be interesting to analyze statistics associated with the draft ( I.E. do causalities increase/decrease? Is general efficiency & accuracy increased/decreased? Is military moral/teamwork instilled?)

A Manic Manifesto (With Gusto. Hold The Pickles)

2008-01-27T20:48:00.000-08:00

(*Originally a journal entry from 1/20)

Time to blog out. I’ve been busy with many different things... Maybe putting my hands in too many jars at once - trying my hand at all forms of media, big and small. There is so much in this life that I want to try. Being that I don’t necessarily believe in a second life after here, at least containing the same amazingly powerful adversity that breeds such creativity, and being that having false idols and looking up to others for their achievements so much that you spend less time on your own stuff is counterproductive, I employ the philosophy that if it looks like fun on the outskirts, it’s even better to be there and living it. Life is a sandbox, man. I’ve figured out that a little talent goes a long way, and that half the battle seems to be in showing up. Not to sound pretentious, but the only times I have truly failed at something is when I have not put effort into it. If you don’t do anything, nothing happens. If you enjoy “expecting the unexpected” than don’t hesitate. I am auditioning for radio, TV, print, films, and I want to do some spoken word shows in the future. Why not? Within my fragile inner sanctum, does that scared little boy think he is worthy of all this stuff and going to get picked first for the team? No. But being that I expect the unexpected, if I don’t audition I won’t get the part. By not trying, all I can expect is what I already know to be true - that zero will change. No gears will turn without the gamble, and the hustle and scramble that comes with working up the nerve to give it a go. I expect the unexpected - therefore, by association I expect to get the job. I fully expect to blow myself away before anyone else. Instead of sticking to the sidelines and not making an attempt, I now give myself the chance to fail, and thus succeed. Despite being tired and weathered, I am awake. Still, I am no cartoonish shining example. I spend long periods laying around. I go full speed ahead, ten straight rounds, then pass out like a champion, in my mind. This happens too often, yet still, I refuse to compromise overall. I refuse to kneel, because the next step is keeling over. I still try. I raise my fist. I’m no revolutionary... It just bugs me that we’d choose to pass the time rather than create and generate... Go some place that resonates beyond average.

What am I talking about? What exactly am I doing? I think internally and externally I’m rebelling against the complacency I see in folks my age, at least around my town, keeping in motion in any small way I can. Does it bother anyone else that our youth uprising consists of drinking and throwing up? In between that, we’re toking up and getting down - that is if we’re not busy just standing around, waiting for the ways and means to get to going out and giving in. If we’re not giving up, we’re surely giving in... To a fear, a tear, or a beer. Our heads are exploding from the pressure of peers. “Peer pressure” is this blanket phrase they throw around that essentially denotes that, you, as a young person, are a lemming, a vessel, with no independent thought, and strictly because you’re friends are hurting themselves, you go and do the same. Having not yet developed a strong enough backbone individually, people build a structure together. Such a system it is, creepily organized... Because “What can we do?” and “There’s nothing to do,” so you follow, such a unique creature you are. Such a rebel. And there will be people who read this, commenting or not, who’ll say “Mike, you don’t know how to have fun.” ‘Lest anyone think I’m some stick in the mud, man, I dig me some fun. I’m vaudeville. I love doing crazy stuff, being funny. I’m all about the party, man. If what I’m talking about was really fun, I would say so. This ain’t fun, and you know it. After the dust settles and you go home - never mind how I think cats don’t appreciate all the stuff laid out for em, such as “home” (that is, if you’re lucky enough to have one.) - after the lights hit you in the face, you feel the emptiness. I’ve been there, and it sucks with a capital “S.” Let’s change this, please. Why not push the limits the right way? Without following tradition, the tail ends of our modern mythology, and ingesting poisonous persuasion and chemical poison. And by the way, in the way of drinking and smoking, you may have heard someone anti- call them “poisons.” Well, let me drop some science on you; that is not just them “overreacting” or using hyperbole. They are, chemically, poison, in small doses. We’re not just intent on killing potential, but our bodies as well. As far as picking apart "poisonous" rhetoric, that's a something for another blog entry.

This is not an anti-drug rant, though. It’s about “Hey let’s do something meaningful with our time, because it ticks and tocks away each day,” instead of following old order that has made us complacent and apathetic. Anyway, drinking, drugging, smoking and fucking is not rebelling from your parents, kids. Your parents did the exact same thing to rebel from your grandparents. There’s always going to be somebody better, but you have to be the best individual you can, bringing the pain while you go against life’s grain. So with that in mind, I’ve been trying to do some cool shit, in between laying in bed for long periods. And in my taking on different projects, in fits and starts, where are all those kids I used to hang with? Some are doing their own cool shit, which I applaud and admire. Others are in the same spots, modeling for the next bunch of kids, who hang outside the video store, where I go to rent flicks. They notice me but they don’t. Maybe they know me, or of me, but I don’t remember, or maybe it’s vice versa. Before I can think to utter in a mocking Bruce Willis-esque tone of cool “You boys gettin’ hiiiigh?” I figure it’s not worth it... Or maybe it is. To get a laugh out of them would bring on some organic pleasure and a rad memory, and interrupt their fleeting search for meaning, in the midst of their “Who hooked up with who” gossip chatter fest. I don’t care that much though... The cold keep my lips pursed together. I didn’t come to do comedy and single handily end the unspoken bitterness of high school “We don’t know him and he looks different than me” clique nonsense. What like they’re a gang or something? Ha! They opt out of saying “Hi” and I’m too into my own to care. I came to run errands, man. As I walk along the streets, chicks gawk at me, and I’m hollered at from passing by SUVs, filled with inebriated white kids, blasting rap tracks. Or at least I think I am.

Am I such a big mouthed enigma that old friends can now only bare to call me when passing by in their (parents’) soon-to-hit-a-tree vehicle? I don’t know if it’s me or them, or a collective. Some of them are now kind of aloof themselves. I’ve got a whole can of worms to clean up it seems, although I never bagged out or backed out on anyone - folks just kind of shuffle off into the shadows, after laughing at my jokes and pining over my appearance (haha). The legit folks are still here and there. I’m kind of done glamorizing friendships... I mean history does playa part, but the bottom line is if a friend is not there for you, or is a dodge, or makes false promises, then they’re not worth the effort. I’m insecure to a degree, which fuels me with a few quirks, but I do have self-confidence, brimming over with each goal not merely set, but willed into completion, and my ego assures me that if, after I’ve tried to reach out for them, and am so readily available, they still stagnate, than they are probably not worth my time. I’m a caring person though. I’m there for you and want to be. Odds are I’ve tried to contact you already. True friends and fans will be there. Purely on a “respect” level I’d think people would kind of enjoy hearing an explanation if someone just disappears out of their life. We’re not too young for courtesy. Maybe in the middle of a mess like this, you went stupid and wrote some bad poetry... And if you were really dumb, you put it up for the world to read.

The scars were never romantic
and now far removed
I've got a smile on my face
now that we're done.
Still got the fangs, but found my place in the sun
The bang from the gun
like the sound of me
waiting for my rocket to come.

The wrongs are now just
So let's jump, 'lest we fall for the fall
and get stuck in the slump
with the rest we once called best.
Now chumps filling an empty weathered nest
time-teathered and untested,
these beer-educated are near dedicated to death.
Making up for lost time, I dig into the next breath.
I found my place in the sun, and the "farewell tour" is far from done.
In this century, I do ask that you remember me, as friend, lover or
more
than an ordinary other.
No doubt you'll know those close enough to see them breath,
yet so joined, you can't tell which one is separate; unique.

Sprawled out on the sidewalk,
you're taller and eye cocked.
You could faultier and die, shocked.
So soak it up and come clean
Honesty will thank you and so will your spleen.
I came with a nightmare and left with a dream
cloths running ragged, now hemmed to the seam.

Rhyme time to get me through missing all of you.
I don't know what I did or can do
to bring it back to that idealized time
where we could just chill and spill
with no in-the-round reveals.
Maybe I'm mistaken,
but it feels like I have to earn back relationships taken.
Overnight, bells stopped ringing
angels quit singing.
I kept dreaming
and now beaming, doing all the things I said I'd do.
But dead in my tracks, know that, no matter the acts, it isn't the same without a friend, gone to something new.
Find something reliable and true, if that's what you're up to.

I'll still be 'round, jumping, though never far from the ground
for what it's worth
still down-to-earth and down for mirth
down to flirt with breaking monotony's curse.
Up for a rebirth.

Under-the-radar, and maybe stuck in a slum.
Don't know where my friends have gone,
but I know when to stop wishing and be done.
Found my place in the sun
On my own
going to get what I want to come.

Time is ticking. In October of 2007 I did my first movie gig, in MY BEST FRIEND’S GIRL, with Dane Cook and Kate Hudson. In December I froze my ass off, but got to hang by Christopher Walken, Morgan Freeman and William H. Macy on THE LONELY MAIDEN. In less than two weeks, this weird chapter of my life comes full circle, as I head to Pittsburgh, PA to be somewhere in ZACK AND MIRI MAKE A PORNO, the eighth film of KEVIN SMITH!
...Something about "dreams do come true." Told ya we'd meet again, on a bigger stage.

With all my love to those who care(ed), I wish you were here.
-Mike Phelan O’Toole.
http://www.MikePhelanOToole.com
http://www.MikeOCast.blogspot.com for audio updates.
http://www.myspace.com/MikeOToole for... Space.
And http://www.youtube.com/captureman 'cause I dig it so.

MIKE-O VIDEO Presents: Mike O'Toole's Fantastic Behind-The-Scenes Musings #1

2008-01-13T17:03:00.000-08:00

PUSH PLAY TO WATCH MIKE'S VIDEOBLOG :

Talk of the writer's guild strike, creativity and Mike's projects ensues.

http://MikeOVideo.blogspot.com
http://youtube.com/MikeOToole
http://MikePhelanOToole.blip.tv
and http://saynow.com/MikeOToole to comment.

"A Look At Bipolar Disorder"

2007-12-29T00:32:00.000-08:00

(*Originally written for my Introduction to Psychology course)

Bipolar Disorder Overview

Bipolar disorder, or sometimes called manic depression, is a chronic mental illness consisting of sudden changes in an individual’s mood, activity, and sense of reality, due to a chemical imbalance in the brain. The condition juxtaposes between varying degrees of mania, and bouts of depression. The duration of manic or depressive episodes can last anywhere from days to months, although stints of mania tend to subside quicker than episodes of depression. The illness tends to first become visible during the age of adolescence or early adulthood, and lasts for the individual’s lifetime (Duckworth, Bipolar Disorder). Although an ultimate cause of the disorder is unknown, the initial trigger is thought to be brought on by a coupling of internal and external factors; a biological predisposition due to a hereditary gene, and a series of emotionally taxing events in the person’s life (Endicott & Quitkin, 1992).

Mania

Depending on the individual, manic episodes can either entail a feeling of euphoria, putting the person in an optimistic, pleasant state of mind, or in a more aggressive, irritable headspace. Typically, the excess energy that mania provides causes increased speech and racing thoughts in those afflicted, leading toward hyperactive, irrational behavior, impulsive decision-making, and decreased sleep. The affected may even experience varying forms of delusion or hallucination, as well as paranoia (Duckworth, Bipolar Disorder).

In the midst of these episodes, one’s sense of reality is distorted into an amalgam of grandiosity and illogic. In a whirlwind of hyperactivity, the manic-depressive individual may begin to dress in a different manner, attempt to take on unrealistic tasks, and generally have no consideration or understanding of the consequences of their bizarre activity. Overtaken by this influx of energy, actions are engaged without pretense, and nonsensical thoughts turn into uninhibited words. This is known as a “flight of ideas” in the mental health community. The manic attack moves at an overwhelming pace, and the inexhaustibility of someone in this state is amazing (Berger & Berger, 1991).

Depression

Contrary to these symptoms are those of the depression phase, which can incorporate feelings of severe sadness, decreased energy, and increased sleep. With the mania phase of bipolar representing the highest of the high, and inserting a feeling of overconfidence, depression is the lowest of low. Whereas mania gave them outlandish ambitions and endless motivation, depression may make it difficult for someone to muster the self-esteem to deem themselves worthy of even the slightest day to day tasks, such as brushing one’s teeth (Endicott & Quitkin, 1992).

During an episode of depression, a person’s life may seem empty, and the concept of their eventual recovery may seem hopeless at the time. Because of this, it is important that signs of a possible attempt at suicide be observed. Studies suggest that, although the “success” rate of attempts is about fifteen percent, more than half of those who have bipolar disorder have made at least one attempt at suicide. Some common signs include general loss of interest in people and activities that once were found enjoyable, and refusal to get out of bed (Berger & Berger, 1991).

Bipolar Treatment

With the proper treatment a person can reduce the frequency of manic-depressive cycling, allowing them the ability to live a relatively normal life. Lithium, which acts as a mood stabilizer, is a popular choice in medical treatment, as it can counteract both depression and mania, as well as be coupled with antidepressant medication.

In cases of acute mania the individual will require hospitalization as part of their treatment, if their impulsiveness is deemed so extreme that they are considered a danger to either themselves or those around them (Endicott & Quitkin, 1992).

In addition to medicine and temporary hospitalization, various forms of therapy, including those employing the interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral approach, as well as family therapy, is a powerful tool for coping with daily stresses that could possibly trigger an episode of both mania and depression (Duckworth, Bipolar Disorder).

A More Personal Look At Bipolar

In an effort to better understand how this illness affects an individual, I conducted a personal interview with “Mary Hawkins,” a woman who has been living with bipolar disorder for over thirty years. Mary’s father showed symptoms of bipolar disorder, and many of her siblings have experienced varying degrees of mania and depression. According to her, several take an active role in accepting and treating their illness, like herself, while others remain in denial and live a tumultuous life, untreated.

When asked when her illness first appeared and what brought it on, Mary revealed that it was first apparent “In the 1980’s, at age 20, when I got stressed out by commuting one hundred miles per day to school, and working five days a week.” Her answer is cognizant with my research that illustrates that those with a family history of bipolar are prone to the disorder themselves, and that it is often brought out due to personally stressful events.

Experiencing her first manic episode was a frightening thing, as the normally shy Mary found herself increasingly more talkative and heading toward “mental and physical burnout.” As a result of her radical changes in behavior, she was hospitalized for the first time. When asked about further treatment for the disorder, Mary informed me that it was during this time she began seeing a therapist and psychiatrist, who prescribed lithium to stabilize the chemical imbalance that was occurring in her brain.

I then asked Mary about her experiences with hospitalizations over the years. She mentioned that attending group therapy and studying your illness play a key role, and that, while being hospitalized during a severe attack of mania or depression is necessary, the system is not perfect; “Sometimes you’ll get locked inside and are not allowed out for even a walk until you’re discharged. It can make you feel like you’re being held in a zoo.”

Having lived a relatively normal life since her diagnosis in the 1980’s, I asked Mary if over time it has gotten easier to identify her own symptoms of manic-depression. She stated that she “Can’t really tell when a high or low is coming on” and that if despite medication, she still is experiencing symptoms of an episode, she has to rely on people that are familiar with her normal personality to assist her.

Following up on this, I wondered if she has noticed any changes in her symptoms with age. Mary said that “The symptoms seem to come more often as I get older. My manic attacks have happened closer together this year.” She is describing rapid-cycling, a state of bipolar where people may experience several episodes in a relatively short period of time. It has been noted that this more commonly occurs in women (Endicott & Quitkin, 1992).

I then asked how typical daily living has changed for her since being afflicted with her illness; “I have trouble waking up and have more difficulty concentrating on things like household tasks. It’s also been more difficult to focus on working. Other than that, the biggest change has been having to remember to take my medication every day in order to remain stable.”

In closing of our interview, Mary talked about how, after diagnosis, she made an effort to learn more about her illness, and has since been active in The National Alliance On Mental Illness, which is “The nation’s largest grassroots mental health organization” (NAMI, About NAMI).

Opinions / Viewpoints

In researching bipolar disorder, I have found it to be at once a treatable illness one can coexist with, and a hellacious burden for not only those that go untreated, but their family and friends. It is a disorder that is commonly misunderstood by the public, often wrongfully labeled as “madness” or confused with vaguely similar mental illnesses like lesser forms of schizophrenia. Despite the existing social stigma of talking about and openly living with a “mental illness,” there is hope, thanks to championing organizations like The National Alliance On Mental Illness educating the public and reaching out to those affected, and individuals like “Mary Hawkins” helping illustrate that, although at times challenging, it is possible to live a happy and productive life with bipolar.

What has become apparent to me is that bipolar disorder is a biologically based brain disease, and should not be looked at any differently than a physical disease, like cancer. At the time of “Mary Hawkin’s” diagnosis, she was an overworked college student, juggling many responsibilities, much like many in the MassBay community. This stress ultimately triggered the one thing she could not control, and ironically the thing that would become her biggest responsibility of all; living with bipolar disorder.

The brain is a supremely complex entity, and we may never unravel the mysteries of mental illnesses completely, but with the wealth of information I shifted through in research, it is evident that information is continously advancing. Despite each brain being different and the degree of condition varying in the individual, it is encouraging. What is also encouraging is to know there are people out in the world, who regardless of such a daunting, life-altering diagnosis as bipolar, have found the courage to go on with their lives, and share their story. Although researching the illness was informative, I found the personal aspect of utilizing an interview as a social science method most impactful. It is necessary to realize that although bipolar is an illness, studied alone, it is the person and people it affects that are truly important.

References

Duckworth, Ken. About Mental Illness : Bipolar Disorder. National Alliance On Mental Illness. Retrived 10 Nov. 2007. <

Endicott, Jean & Quitkin, Frederick M. (1992). Depression and Other Mood Disorders. In L.B. Morris (Ed.), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons( Complete Home Guide To Mental Health ( pp.108-124). New York:Henry Holt and Company, Inc.

Berger, D. & Berger, L. (1991). We Heard The Angels Of Madness. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

About NAMI. National Alliance On Mental Illness. Retrived 10 Nov. 2007. <

MIKE-O RADIO Live Fridays @ 9PM EST/6PM PST

2007-12-18T22:50:00.000-08:00

Hey all - a quick update:
Hit this link, or I'll go Walken on you!
http://my.saynow.com/playMsg.html?ak=U3RraExaNERpa3I1cXB4UXpVdkx2dz09

I do a LIVE web stream show where you can call in and chat about whatever -
Fridays on http://NowLive.com/MikeOToole @ 9PM EST/6PM PST
It's a friggin' blast so far!

Wanna talk on the show? CALL in at
(203) 413-5275
or one of the following numbers:
(201) 661-7217
(201) 881-7570
(203) 413-5275

Then Press 2 on your phone
and enter the show ID number:
256449

Once you're on the line, you will be able hear the show, and we see that you've called, but we are not able to hear you. You will pop up in Mike's "Callers" section on his monitor during the show - please hang on and listen until Mike puts you through and says "You're on the air," at which point you're a part of the show, and can deliver your contribution to the audio orgy.

Go to http://mikeoradio.blogspot.com for more!
My PODCAST will still continue as a seperate thing at http://mikeocast.blogspot.com and http://myspace.com/mikeotoole

Later! Talk to you on the air!

-M.

OUR NEW LIVE VIDEO/MUSIC/COMEDY EVENT - 11/16/07!

2007-11-09T11:49:00.000-08:00

"THE RANDOM ACTS VIDEO DISASTER"

It's that time again - sweet sweet multimedia experience-in-an-art gallery time!

Experi-mental videos by Lawrence Hollie and Mike Phelan O'Toole (with host Quincy Brisco, stand-up comedian Tom Gregory, and acoustic guitar performance by Wayne Langford-Rogers)

When:

Nov 16, 2007 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm (Friday)

Where:

Out of the Blue Art Gallery
106 Prospect Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

After years of bitching and moaning "When, Lord?! When's it gonna be our time?!" the Manic Schematic/Lot 2 team is finally getting in on all the sweet, sweet film and video screening, artsy fartsy gallery action!

A little piece of insanity comes to Cambridge, as Lawrence Hollie and Mike Phelan O'Toole return to take over the historic Out Of The Blue gallery for another night of visually stunning, odd and entertaining underground films, video shorts, and live action tomfoolery with a crew of unique personalites like no other - Friday, November 16th, 2007!

Peep out flicks never before screened at the 'Blue! Marvel as special guest speakers provide A's for your Q's after each screening!

And what flicks and which guests are in store for you? Read on:

* Lawrence Hollie's NEW, theatrically inspired compilation of his RANDOM ACTS local TV series - including talk show appearances by Mike Phelan O'Toole, and vampire themed artistry.

(After which, we'll be shooting the Q&A for the next RANDOM ACTS TV episode)

* Quincy Brisco's NATIONAL ANTHEME

* Mike O'Toole's newest video piece, with poetry recordings mixed in.

* A boisterous stand-up comedy performance by comedian Tom Gregory.

* A note worthy acoustic guitar performance by local favorite and "Insubordinate" TV personality Wayne Langford-Rogers

* Assorted D.I.Y. tomfoolery that we cannot mention here.

If you would like to submit a video or perform or exhibit ANY type of artistic expression, the fee for soloists is 5 dollars, and 10 dollars for a group.

Laughter is the easiest vacation (and cheapest)

5 dollars for the night gets you all this, plus FREE snacks, drinks, great conversation with cool people, and memories for life.

If you're going to be in town, there's no reason good enough not to stop in. Visit http://youtube.com/randomacts73 , http://MikePhelanOToole.com , http://myspace.com/mikeotoole, http://myspace.com/insubordinate AND http://outoftheblueartgallery.com for news as it breaks.

(ALSO POSSIBLY LOOKING FOR A PHOTOGRAPHER FOR THIS EVENT. EXPERIENCE NOT NEEDED - COME SHOOT AND HAVE FUN IN THIS UNIQUE ATMOSPHERE!)

When:

Nov 16, 2007 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm (Friday)

Where:

Out of the Blue Art Gallery
106 Prospect Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

HTTP://WWW.EVENTFUL.COM/MIKEOTOOLE

The "What I Did Yesterday" Kind of Affair Begins - 9/2 & 9/3/07

2007-09-26T11:27:00.000-07:00

It’s been a weird week, and I’m wiped, but if I don’t post this, I won’t be able to sleep - here is my attempt at simply recounting things - nothing too breathtakingly detailed; just a “what I did yesterday” log, so that my day-to-day is not lost forever in the matrix of my mind, and maybe you, brave reader will enjoy it to some degree.

The week begins on Sunday 9/2/2007 -

I Wake up around 4:00PM, get a call from my bud and video production partner Lawrence, wanting to hang out. I get in a brief workout, shower, then head out with him, looking for eats. With most places closed due to it being the Sunday before Labor day, it’s a challenge finding a decent place to feed. We stop at a Dunkin, with Larry picking up his trademark black coffee (you know, because he is monk-like and no frills.... And black.) Ready to splurge, I go for some famous Waltham pizza but am let down when I see that the door of the joint is locked. On that note, I grab McDonald’s, making a sad sad token attempt at “healthy” by ordering the grilled chicken sandwich, with lettuce, tomato with no mayo, and a DIET coke of course.

We head back to his place, gorging ourselves on his work-supplied free cable’s on-demand service. I crack open my back pack to share “Clerks II” with him. He pops in the DVD and is blown away. Larry crashes soon after. I watch some more shit, until I submit to heavy eyelids, sleeping in my clothes - dreaming of Kevin Smith’s return to Larry’s TV station, man. Good shit.

Monday 9/3 -

Wake up around 10:00 or 11:00AM at Lawrence’s apartment to cliché video game sound effects and a sore back from sleeping fucked-up on the floor. Assuming the FX are radiating from Larry attacking his Nintendo DS, I’m none too impressed by the stimuli, going back to sleep without a word until 2:30PM, wherein Lawrence suggests we hit the beach (THE beach? Yes, that one. Heck, I don’t even know where exactly it was - some derivative of The Charles River I presume).

Summer is almost at a close, as short as it is here in New England - I’m game for a trip, so I grab my wallet and watch, take a leak, and we pile into his car, which vaguely reeks of something that once permeated out of an edible - maybe Indian cuisine - as per-usual.

We wheel it to Kelly’s Roast Beef, encountering the mundane nature of the food service industry to a tee, man. The experience is only redeemed by my spying this cute, short chick at the counter that I’m all about. Upon placing and waiting for our order, we grab the classic roast beef grub and head out, navigating through a small crowd of rotund white yuppies during the epic journey toward the exit.

Once outside, we marvel at the lack of benches at the eatery - with no other option, we plunk down on the curb and shoot the shit for a half hour or so regarding future media projects, talking’ shop, as well as laugh our asses off pulling quotes from the greatest motion picture of all time, WINDY CITY HEAT. It’s a beautiful day - with the sun beating down and the afternoon ticking away, we’re back in the car.

We get to the water’s side - jumping out and hitting a convenience store for caffeine and the like. We walk a length, eventually climbing up a hilly area, settling on a bench atop what over looks the water and a series of cliffs. It’s serene - Lawrence walks down and checks out the cliffs further down. I relieve myself from the Coke I purchased from the mom and pop store from a ways back .

We plant ourselves back on the bench, chilling there until around 8:00PM, lost in the picturesque backdrop, jawing about different family dysfunction, as well as future projects and marketing strategy stuff. We talk about Quincy, and how badly he wants to become a star, and how we’ll manage to deliver that fame to him - he deserves it.

After it gets dark, I figure we should start heading back, dodging bats and rats on the way. Back in the car, we hit Whole Foods, and back in my town, 7/11, where I pick up some soda and a chicken salad sandwich. I realize that I ingest Coca-cola to put a diabetic to shame. Yes, that’s right, I’m addicted to Coke.

We part, with Law wishing me good luck regarding my next college semester, starting that tomorrow. I head inside the home base, saying hello to grandmother, and do some internet work, checking e-mail and approving folks for the Straight Edge Facebook group. I also check our promo stuff, seeing a couple of new youtube subscribers to my page, and managing Quincy’s myspace.

I throw clothes in the wash, getting in a workout, cranking the stereo, before hitting the bathroom, reading’ some comics while it’s “going on.” When my laundry load is done, I throw it in the dryer. I down a blender’s worth of my protein shake, regretting it minutes later. I “snap one off” and hit the hay around 1:00AM or so.

Read more updates tomorrow - e.g. “The rest of the week" at http://www.thesoulenigma.livejournal.com and coming soon, http://www.mikeotoole.blogspot.com and http://blog.myspace.com/mikeotoole

What do you kids think of this format? I even used spell check, fools.

-- Mike Phelan O’Toole

"Assessment of Leadership Skills"

2007-05-23T22:27:00.000-07:00

*(Originally written for my Communication course)

The importance of the ability to take on leadership in a group is infinite. Not being content to simply follow our peers, as leaders we take hold of a collective of intangible, personal characteristics, and employ them at the most crucial moments of group communication. The ability to take on the task of being a mediator in moments of conflict, and being able to smooth over any miscommunication , while still acknowledging group diversity, and maintaining the overall objective of your colleagues as a group provides a foundation for success, not only in a work or academic setting, but also in social situations. In an attempt to analyze my own leadership qualities, I have collected two individual opinions, one from a classmate, and the other from someone who observes me in a professional setting. From these results I hope to uncover conclusions about whether others see me as a possible effective leader, or not.

The first individual I collected impressions from was a fellow classmate from my Mass Media course; Josh. We had previously worked together as a team on a written paper and presentation for the class, and although our time together was not extensive, I was interested in seeing what his opinion would be, us having interacted as a team for the relatively brief period of about a month. Josh had mostly positives to say, and was not as hard on me as I was in evaluating myself. This further confirms that, although I do not feel that I have poor communication skills or insufficent ability to become a leader, others see positive qualities in me that I sometimes miss. I feel in order for me to become a better leader in communication, it is essential that I take into account other peoples’ perspectives and interpretations. In this case, having given what I believe to be a completely unbiased testimonial on my leadership skills, Josh has fueled me to continue to perfect expressing myself and communicating with others. Because our relationship had little prior history, I believe the opinions he expressed were pure gut reactions after absorbing my personality and attitude in our interaction and unfiltered communication.

The individual who has been in a formal position to observe me, is a person I edit video for at a local cable station I work at; Lawrence Hollie. His impressions of me were similar to Josh’s, in that the majority was positive, but realistic. Due to a varied history, and working with him in a variety of capacities, Lawrence has a good idea of my communication skills and how I can articulate myself and take charge of a situation, whether it is expressing a comment or concern while working on something, or when the two of us engage each other in spiritual or other less concrete conversation on a break from work. We are both very talkative, unique, verbal people, and in a work setting, being on the same wave length of comprehension helps a great deal in minimizing the “noise” occurring in our channel of communication. Lawrence’s opinions in filling out the assessment sheet on me were indeed positive, due to the fact that, although I often am assisting him on whatever projects he needs completed, I also take every opportunity to lead the way in how I articulate myself in a multitude of scenarios, and the particular tasks and projects I voluntarily take on.

In overall analysis of the evaluations I received back, it can be concluded that, whether in a brief, informal communication relationship, or a more storied, working relationship, I have the potential to utilize a multitude of leadership skills, via natural speaking ability, and an impressionable positive attitude on those I interact with. Regardless of past history, I received virtually the same feedback on my communication skills regarding potential leadership situations, from two very different individuals. Josh’s response was interesting in particular, as it is fair to say that his responses were based on what were essentially his first impressions of me in any or all of the scenarios listed. Ultimately, this exercise exists as an important reflective tool for me, as I fight for leadership contention, in a world of fast-talkers; some with little substance of integrity in all their distracting verbiage. My goal is for my words, mannerisms, and interactions in leadership to command attention not simply due to rhetoric or persuasion, but more because of the power in the real-world messages and values behind them, and my down-to-earth, approachable demeanor.

"Assessment of Listening and Questioning Skills"

2007-05-23T21:57:00.000-07:00

*(originally written for my Communication course)

Do you ever get the feeling no one is listening? Or that you are just not being heard? In effective communication, it is vital for us to be able and aware enough to process what we hear, and provide feedback in reaction to it. Without a dedication to listening and questioning, conversation and an open, honest exchange of ideas is hopeless. There are a multitude of factors that can play into the way in which we choose to take in information, process it, and contribute to the communication flow. Our mood, previous events in our day, and even our gender can affect the formula in which we decide to interact, whether at work, school, or leisure. During the course of our busy lives we rarely get an insight into how the people around us, view our methods of listening and questioning in communication. Through having a friend of mine, and also a person I work under in a professional setting answer basic questions on their perceptions of my style of listening and questioning, I sought to find out the similiarities or differences in their responses to how I perceive myself.

The person who I chose to evaluate me in the “professional setting,” was Melinda, the Educational Access Coordinator at the local cable station I help out at. I have worked with her a lot, and thought that she could offer some valid contribution to this exercise. It is interesting to note then, that her answers were very similar to my own, when it comes to evaluating how I listen and question in the flow of communication. I believe I listen and question effectively and appropriately. Melinda agreed, and eagerly checked off “usually” for the majority of the questions. Ironically enough, I was a little harder on myself, answering “sometimes” for several of my questions. In evaluating this, I believe that her answers give a more accurate indication of my skills in communication, as she is obviously seeing me express these outside of myself, and in varying settings, with different people on a fairly regular basis. Our communication is strong, and there is always positive reinforcement of listening and questioning on both our parts, which stimulates healthy verbal exchanges.

The other individual I requested to participate in this “experiment,” is someone who I know in a much less formal setting. This is my good friend Ave. She also is a very verbal person, and in my opinion communicates her thoughts and ideas very well. In our listening and questioning skills, we are very similar. It is for this reason that we “feed off each other” in conversation, and there is hardly ever any “noise” in our channel. Ave answered the questions about my communication skills very much the same way as Melinda. This was very exciting for me to see, as it allowed me to draw conclusions about myself that I had never thought about previously. These conclusions being, that regardless of setting or relationship level, I am able take in another person’s messages and interpret the content in order to ask questions appropriately, and encourage healthy communication. I am in no way perfect, but gathering these results has allowed me to take pride in communicating well, regardless of the person or setting. It has also taught me that, my communication skills do foster positive relationships with important people in my life, and allow me to be more outgoing in my approach to life!

Rough draft written for a Straight Edge article

2007-04-01T23:20:00.000-07:00

Here is my original response written by request of a college journalism major who contacted me online, looking for personal sources on what it means to be Straight Edge and in college. Although this is not my best writting on Edge yet, it came from a very real, gut place, as a writer and an Edge kid. To read the article excerpts of my resonse were used in, visit this link:

https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5862168462140992081&postID=7198284215717473247

"Straight Edge felt right for me. There's such an emphasis on the connection between youth and the drug culture, that its nice to know that there is an alternative support system out there. At a time when a lot of young people are looking to belong, Straight Edge validates those that are strong enough to stray from getting caught up in destructive behavior. The beliefs are only one piece of it; the idea that there is a culture, with its own history, and an active community that promotes healthy living and togetherness is empowering.

Personally, I had previously experimented with marijuana. Its almost impossible not to come accross it in a group of young people, and there's a certain curiosity there; kind of a don't knock it 'till you try it thing. So, I thought I would try it. I never was a big user though. I also was once prescribed pain killers, and found myself slightly addicted. I had also smoked cigarettes on my own and socially before. Actually, it ended up intriguing a best friend enough to start smoking himself. I feel responsible for that, and it definitely bugs me. Generally the physical reliance that came from smoking and drugs were what made me think twice about continuing them. At that point, my decisions where no longer my own, and I didn't like that. Any momentary positives to smoking or drugs paled in comparison to the long term negatives, all around.
As for alcohol, beyond trying it to see what it was like, I've never been a fan of it. I just cant see myself putting that stuff in my body.

Peer pressure was never much of a factor for me. Every decision, before or after claiming Straight Edge, was my own. The problem becomes, when you're in a group and you're partial to something like smoking or drinking, and other people are doing it, its tough to resist. For me, getting over that was tough, but never had to do with wanting to fit in, more than simply getting over what became a physical craving. That's true for anything I think. If you are on a diet, and you walk into a room where all your friends are pigging out on your favorite food, your stomach is going to taunt you. At that point it becomes a matter of will and commitment to your goals. No matter how much you might value your friends, your decisions come first. This should be true anyway, but its especially important when it comes to putting stuff directly into your body. Your body is a temple; nobody owns it but you. I wanted to stop putting poison in my body. When you have a strong desire to stick to abstaining from this stuff, seeing all the negative aftereffects makes it that much easier to remain drug free. If you eat too much pizza at a party, you might gain weight or have a stomach ache. If you binge drink, overdose, or contract an STD from casual sex you could end up dead... So that's a large incentive to avoiding things like that all together... You know, living. I enjoy it too much to sell myself short.

To me, Straight Edge isn't really about no drugs, alcohol, or random hooking up. Its about making the best decisions for yourself. YOURSELF is the key word. I developed these beliefs before truly embracing the Straight Edge culture or title. It was about personal control. I'm a smart guy;I pretty much just weighed the options, and Straight Edge won hands down. Im not saying folks who drink, smoke, hook up, or do drugs are dumb, but moderation is the key. For me, Edge makes too mush sense to not endorse it. If the belief in healthy decision making is the heart that keeps that dedication pumping, than the STRAIGHT EDGE world is the backbone of it. Straight Edge is a community. For someone like me, who felt myself losing a bit of control, and decided to steady that with a bit of integrity, it is like a big, welcoming family. Although the title and specific culture originated out of the hardcore music scene, it has spread far beyond that. However, it only helps us if people see that when it comes to rock and roll, it isn't all about sex and drugs; Straight Edge is, in fact, a ROCK STAR thing.

Rather than spell out their distaste for what amounts to negativity, kids can simply proclaim that they are Straight Edge. You take pride in the title, because you take pride in not only the bare belief system, which could rightfully live on its own, but the commitment to staying true to yourself, your friends, and your family. Edge is a lifelong commitment. To those who use it as something of a stepping stone past the peer pressure of the drug culture, personally, I can't criticize. Edge gives you a validation that says you can be yourself, while still feeling like a part of something bigger, beyond a fraternity, or a group of stoners. In that way, you're promoting a peacefulness and mentality that enriches someonesself esteem and confidence. Rather than inciting conflict, what you are saying with Straight Edge, versus the more typical college culture, is to each their own. One of the most common misconceptions of Straight Edge is that the majority who claim Edge are militant toward those who do not subscribe to it. As with any group, with enough people involved, you will occasionally run into a bad apple or two. Personally, I have no problem with someone who doesn't agree with me. Its their decision, and their body. What I' have a problem with, is if these activities got out of control. Then, I would have no choice but to speak up and act. But this doesn't have much to do with Edge itself. Generally, I would hope that, if you felt that any of your friends or family were hurting themselves, you would be prompted to intervene. I choose Straight Edge, simply because I dint feel the need to risk losing control. I dig that I remember everything that happened last Saturday night.

Although a lot of folks blend together vegan or vegetarianism and sexual abstinence in with Straight Edge, they are simply an extension of the Straight Edge philosophy. It begins to take on a life of its own. While, originally, the mantra was DON'T DRINK, DON'T SMOKE, DON'T FUCK, which simply expressed the idea that you should make responsible decisions when it comes to this stuff, and not over do it, the modern philopshy of Edge is to never ever drink, smoke, or do drugs. However, while some individuals do not have sex at all, the general consensus is that sexual activity is okay, within a healthy context; meaning within a caring, dedicated relationship. Straight Edge is about making the best decisions, in order to enjoy and take control of your life. I find a certain joy in sex, and sometimes I like to take control, you know?

As far as how I specifically learned about the Straight Edge culture, I would have to say the Internet. Its such a powerful resource. Im sure that previously the main source of publicity came at rock shows, and through other kids who dug bands that preached the Edge mantra, like the founding fathers of Edge, Minor Threat. For me, looking online, to try to see that I was not alone in my philosophy, Straight Edge was the greatest thing. I mightve seen the Xs on clothing or something, but doing my homework on music culture and positive youth decisiomaking lead me to embrace Edge. The web is the perfect medium in spreading the word about things like this; things that may have been considered completely underground only a few years ago, are available. After all, you found me through an Edge group on FaceBook.com. I think, with anything you strongly believe in, you have a certain responsibility to get the message out there even further, especially something like Edge. People, particularly young people who are looking for a place to belong, need to know that there are alternatives to the binge drinking, drug abusing and sexual wasteland that litters the landscape around us. I know there are some kids out there somewhere who are involved in this stuff, who otherwise wouldn't be, if it were not for feeling alone and wanting to be accepted. Kids get passive about it, and don't realize that its destroying us, as individuals, and as a group. I feel like its almost a mob mentality, you know? I feel like kids, and society in general feels like, simply because other people are doing it, that its right. I just find it hard to believe that this many college or high school kids are truly into fucking themselves up so much, regardless to if they realize the effects or not. What is it that dictates that just because I'm young, I should be into this?

Because of so many representing us so poorly, as young people, we have to fight to take respect back. The first step to being respected by the world, is self respect. Taking on the Straight Edge is the ultimate exercise in this. As a person who is Straight Edge, and a young voice, I don't want to be out there shoving anything down anyones throat. I just want kids to start questioning the way things are going, and know that theres a community of positive thinkers out there ready to support them in being who they are, and who they want to be. I want everyone to know that this is simply, a positive, cool movement, with something to say. Theres no reason good enough for kids not to consider it; after all, Straight Edge is punk rock."

"Living Life on the Straight-Edge" by Brittany Byron

2007-04-01T22:55:00.000-07:00

Here is an article written by a journalism major, Brittany Byron, who contacted me online and asked for my thoughts on being Straight Edge. This is the final piece, with excerpts of my written response used toward the end. I will be the first to say that I'm not an incredible authority when it comes to the history of Edge culture, however I have created a rapidly growing online community dedicated to student outreach and Straight Edge activism, and am always researching information and growing as a voice in this community. I will post what was my entire orignal response soon, but for now please enjoy this piece and spread it around wherever you can. I was given a copy of this article around 1/23/07. Thank you Brittany. For questions or comments regarding Straight Edge or anything else, email MikeOVideo@gmail.com

"It’s your typical Friday night at the fraternity house. Music blaring, crowds of people, kegs strewn about. Nearly everyone has a red cup in their hand, not-so-inconspicuously hiding the fact that orange juice isn’t their beverage of choice for the evening. As the night progresses more and more people start to feel the effects, and before you know it every person in the room is under the influence. Well, almost every person. While a member of the fraternity, Dustin Paulik is without a red cup in his hand, and plans to keep it that way.

Three years ago, Dustin made the decision to live his life “Straight Edge”: without the influence of drugs, alcohol or premarital sex. This decision may sound extreme, but it is a more common lifestyle among todays young people than you may think. Today there are an approximate 6,000 young people who call themselves “Straight Edge”.

However, while this may sound like a great way for young people to live their lives, Straight Edge-ers are often on the receiving end of some pretty harsh criticism and negative stereotyping by not only the media, but their peers as well. Straight Edge is a lifestyle closely associated with punk music, even getting its start from the 1980s punk rock band Minor Threat. During their time, the punk rock scene, like most rock and roll scenes, was filled with substance abuse and violence. As a response to what was going on, Ian MacKaye wrote the song “Straight Edge”, which speaks to his feelings that substance abuse was something he just didn’t need.

"I'm just a person like you/ But I've got better things to do/Than sit around and fuck my head/ Hang out with the living dead/ Snort white shit up my nose/ pass out at the shows/ I don't even think about speed/ that's something I just don't need I've got the straight edge". After hearing the song, many fans began to call themselves “Straight Edge”, abstaining from all drugs and alcohol. They even began identifying themselves using X symbols, which are what bouncers at shows would draw on the hand of anyone underage so they could not be served.

Today, punk rock and the X symbol are still two major factors of the Straight Edge lifestyle. And this is where a lot of the negative stereotyping comes into effect. Because many Straight Edge-ers are still avid punk rock fans, many incorporate other aspects of the genre into their lifestyle as well, such as clothing and hair choices. Often times this means dark clothing, piercings and either long or Mohawk style hair. Add some X’s either tattooed to their body or showing somewhere on their clothes and many people rushed to yell “Cult!”. This is just one of the many misconceptions Straight Edge-ers are eager to clear up.

When asked about the connotation of “cult” Dustin says it is one of the biggest misconceptions society has about the Straight Edge lifestyle. “People think that straight-edge is a cult or religion.” says Dustin. “The truth is, the lifestyle has nothing to do with religion. I am a firm Christian, and I do believe that straight-edge is used as a way to better myself and to be good to those around me. As far as it being a cult, you take on the straight-edge as an individual, not as a group.”

Growing up in Pittsburg, Dustin says drugs were a huge problem in his hometown.

“In my town, a lot of smuggling occurs and it is very common to see someone high or drunk. About 3 years ago, some of my closest friends became involved with drugs. I immediately thought to myself ‘Why do I need to poison my body with that crap?’ Over time, I developed a deep hatred for drugs and alcohol and determined that going straight-edge is the best move I could make.” Says Dustin.

While Straight Edge is an individual endeavor, the members of it have an uncommonly tight bond, and like to fell as if they work as a support system for one another.

“There’s such an emphasis on the connection between youth and the drug culture, that it’s nice to know that there is an alternative support system out there. At a time when a lot of young people are looking to belong, Straight Edge validates those that are strong enough to stray from getting caught up in destructive behavior. The beliefs are only one piece of it. The idea that there is a culture with its own history, and an active community that promotes healthy living and togetherness, is empowering.” Says Mike Phelan O’Toole, a 20-year-old Straight Edger from Massachusetts. Unlike Dustin, Mike had previously experimented with drugs and alcohol, but says he learned quickly they just weren’t for him. Once learning about the Straight Edge movement, he says the choice was simple.

Overall, Straight Edge isn’t about simply abstaining from drugs and alcohol. For those who embrace the culture, it is about embracing the decisions that are best for them, and being secure enough in themselves to make those decisions despite the cultural norm. Sometimes the red cups just aren’t for everyone, and Straight Edgers are okay with that."

CREDIT: Brittany Byron

"Thanksgiving Game VS TANKsgiving Strain."

2007-04-01T22:23:00.000-07:00

In keeping with this new My Cracked Syntax blog of mine, here is a collected writing that I thought just decent enough to post for posterity. It was originally done on 9/24/2006 for a friends English project wherein two individual accounts of the same day/time span were to be recorded and observations compared;

My name is Mike O'Toole. On Thanksgiving Day, 2005, there was a lot on my mind... Which is similar to most days. However, holidays have a way of provoking a refreshed perspective and a multitude of previously unconfronted emotions in you. At the time, I was wrestling with the juxtaposition between relishing in the commercial aspects of the holiday, and the true, sentimental aspects. For one thing, I love me some turkey. The massive consumption of the traditional Thanksgiving feast is so socially acceptable that I venture to say, not even the likes of Paris Hilton thinks twice in pigging out on "Turkey Day." However, something was hindering my appetite. And rest assured, that certain something had nothing to do with the commercially promoted elements of the holiday. Indeed, the feelings that plagued me were of the sentimental variety. For one thing, you have the standard family gathering which coincides with dinner. Now, depending on what type of relationship you generally have with your family, it can be a good thing, or a not so good thing. For me, it's a fairly mixed bag, save a few loose cannons likely to go off from time to time. I do love my folks, and while I was looking forward to seeing everyone, there was that slight bit of apprehension I assume a lot of people feel, over the idea of having to listen to that certain relative drone on and on about... What else but the turkey? There is one theme that rings true for most everyone fortunate enough to gather before a Thanksgiving dinner, and that is "togetherness."

However, this year also meant a certain separation, being the last year that my high school graduating class would be together as one. Yes, it was senior year, which meant embracing class activities, while maintaining an individual plan, mainly that of figuring out where you'd be next year. Amidst that pressure, comes the previously mentioned post grad activities. One particular annual event that surrounds the Thanksgiving holiday, as well as a sense of school pride, is that of the traditional Thanksgiving senior football game. Seeing as it would be our class involved in the game this year, as seniors, it was particularly exciting. The rivalry between Needham and Wellesley is one of the most storied in high school football, I believe. Needless to say, in a town and school that holds their high school football team so sacred, this game was a big deal. I had attended several games in the past, however, with the game taking place in Wellesley that year, and my head being somewhere else, in the midst of deciding what my future plans would be, I neglected to attend this one. The sentimental nature of this particular event did , however, affect me to a certain extent. Honestly, I'm not the biggest football fan, particularly high school football. My attachment to the idea of the game had nearly nothing to do with football itself; more over, it was the first of the last significantly noted high school events of our class of 2005 . I'm not quite sure why I dowelled on the finality of all this high school stuff so much. In hindsight, it had a lot to do with the fear of change, and regrets of not previously participating in other class activities. My limited school interaction came about thanks to a clinical depression that assisted in my earning an infamous badge of honor , in the form of one of the most spotty attendance records in the state.

Around the time of the Thanksgiving game, I was just starting to really get over these problems, and my personality was shining through like that first break of day. It was for these reasons that I felt a certain sense of urgency in making up for lost time with my peers. There was a pressure to establish, or reestablish my social identity within a designated span of time. For any teenager in this chapter, its tough attempting to fit in, while holding claim to a unique identity with genuine integrity. For myself, it was tough grappling with the concept that, due to my previous attendance issues, I wouldn't be able to participate in any major senior class activities. I felt the need to overcompensate, and extend myself to certain people I had once neglected, in order to socially prove myself. Illustrating to folks that I was no longer a lost cause, and truly a good apple, was incredibly important as a result of my prior follies and subsequent regrets. This philosophy still breaths pure, to this day, as I soak up the diverse social and academic setting here, at MassBay. To some, community college might seem like a step below them. For me, its a rung up, inviting me to seize the success and camaraderie I missed, due to previous twists of fate, and mistakes during high school.

That Thanksgiving Day, our high school football game came and went. So did senior year. However, I made it to my aunts South Boston home, for that turkey I craved just as much as having the opportunity to catch up with my 2005 classmates and act as the social creature I so deeply am. Fortunately, I did get to feel the catharsis that comes from good conversation, with loved ones at the dinner table that night. Despite a few bumps in the road, due to conflicts with one family member, things went memorably well. I say it is possible to give such thanks observed on Thanksgiving on any other day, just as it is over the traditional turkey and stuffing. That year, despite a few obstacles, I know I rejoiced in giving thanks for all the potentials developing in my life, a lot due in part to the support of the family I was sitting down to dinner with. I know that this year, in much better shape, mentally and physically, as well as socially and academically, there will be no qualms in my shouting the unforeseen degree of thankfulness I have for all the people I've reconnected with, and met, as well as all the things I've accomplished and learned since that Thanksgiving of 2005; football or no football.

"Daily Stuff."

2007-03-29T21:11:00.000-07:00

Another collected writing: originally composed on 3/16/2007.

I roll out of bed around ten, go downstairs to check my school email and see if I can get out of one midterm exam today, as I have the same professor for two classes, and exams, one after another. The deal is done - no humanities midterm until next week. What a nice guy. I come to terms with having to face my philosophy exam alone. Although I did study at school until 10:00pm, I always feel like I miss the more important pieces to the puzzle. It's a situation I've felt before - like I have a grasp of things, but could use a tighter grip. Not exactly firing on all cilenders, I go back upstairs, relieve the so-called piss-boner, apply the facial cream like only Patrick Bateman can, rinse my razor and bask in the steam of the faucet, in an effort to open my pours before taking a hot disposable triple-blade to 'em. I crank some Lit, after which I apply the shaving cream, shave - with and against the grain, until I look like a prettier version of Spiderman's Carnage - pull street clothes, including my "You Looked Better On MySpace" t-shirt, if only for the sake of it being green and today being St. Pat's Day weekend - out of the closet, dig through the clean laundry to find just the right combination of undergarments, and jet into the bathroom to shower, brush my teeth, wash my face, apply deodorant and aftershave - to which I owe the subsequent burning senstation - and throw some gel in my hair. I'm gone. If only the process itself was as quick and simple as typing it is.

I hitch a ride to school, with some last minute glances at my notes, and in minutes I'm in class, hussling to finish a test that, by all my calculations went well, but could have gone much better, had I had fifteen more minutes test taking time, and three hours more study time. The professor is horridly sick, which in turn shakes me, as I'm just getting over a cold that threw me for a loop. I hand in that midterm-shit, with a keen "not finished" scrawled accross the top, via the instruction of the professor. I hobble downstairs to the computer lab and update this journal, relieving some anxiety and using up any post-test "academic adrenaline" I worked up in the process. I consider getting the f*ck out of there, as what was a nice spring day only hours ago, has since turned into a blizzard-like phenom. New England weather - wait five minutes right? I bomb around to see if I can find any friends still there, up for car-pool tomfoolery. No luck (of the Irish). I putz around on the 'net some more, peeping out Kevin Smith's blog, as it relaxes me. Minutes from this, one of the janitors comes in the lab and says school is closing. I call for a ride and jet home, driving past five car accidents on the way. F*ck this climate.

"Kicking Back Toward A Comeback, Kid."

2007-03-29T21:02:00.000-07:00

A collected writing of mine: originally composed on 3/13/2007.

The only thing I can think to do now is kick back and reflect - tap, tap and tap on the keys for the world to read, while I realize that far and away from home things are cool, calm and prolific for yours truly. I've figured out that any bouts with stress don't even really correlate with the degree of workload on my back. 'Tis simply a matter of surroundings, and thus the subsequent head-space I'm locked in. I have been hanging in the computer lab at the college for the past several days as apposed to being trucked back home after my classes. Here it's all good - my time is my own. Right now I can only muster up the energy to drop a blog update, but generally I produce homework like a mad man when I'm alone in here, in my little cubicle-like space. The challenge is dragging myself together and gettin' here. After I'm here I really could care less about how I'm going to leave. All this week I'm catching up and reigning in my shit with a fury with midterm coming up. Next week is the holy grail known as Spring Break - sadly my best plans at the moment include catching up with work and getting bookings to do some good ol' editing and punk rock-esque videography on the streets.

I just got word that Tony is leaving NewTV, which is a bit of a shocker, but it is about time. That is to say, the guy deserves better, and to be in high places. Is he gonna make it there? That's up to him. I think he can get it together :)
I love that place, man; for many reasons, but no one knows that working there is what kept me grounded, so to speak, when I was a teenager. Meaning, if not for my connections there, there was no other reason not to have me moved to some other end of the Earth. It was Mike Padden that saved the day right there. In retrospect, was staying in town a good thing? I don't know. I guess I tend to play the ball where it lays. Sometimes that's a bad thing though. Because, you know, sometimes the ball gets stolen from you and chucked over the fence, into the asshole neighbors' yard and destroyed by their doberman pincher. You'll find me on the road less traveled.

I'm incomplete right now - daily grind is not easy. You're not born knowing how to operate and pull yourself together. You just learn gradually, through putting on your pants one leg at a time, sometimes two legs at a time. I operate on my own, but as soon as I find that right person to toss witty banter toward again, all will be right, and we will eat many a homemade waffle cone, prior to four hours of conversation that escape in a blink; you lost in my words, while I'm lost in your eyes.